Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission file number 1-6033
UAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
incorporation or organization) |
|
Location: 1200 East Algonquin Road, Elk Grove Township, Illinois 60007 | |
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 66919, Chicago, Illinois 60666 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) | |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (847) 700-4000 |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes X No
Indicate the number of shares
outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the
latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2005
Index | |||||
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Page No.
|
|||
Item 1. Financial Statements | |||||
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Financial Position (Unaudited) - as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
3
|
||||
Statements of Consolidated Operations (Unaudited) - - for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 |
5
|
||||
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (Unaudited) - for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 |
7
|
||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
8
|
||||
Item 2. Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
25
|
||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About
Market Risk |
37
|
||||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
38
|
||||
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
Item 6. Exhibits |
39
|
||||
Signatures |
40
|
||||
Exhibit Index |
41
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession)
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Financial Position (Unaudited)
(In Millions)
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Current assets: | ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 1,677
|
$ 1,223
|
Restricted cash |
968
|
877
|
Short-term investments |
16
|
78
|
Receivables, net |
1,131
|
951
|
Inventories, net |
233
|
234
|
Deferred income taxes |
105
|
96
|
Prepaid fuel expense |
259
|
187
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
312
|
268
|
4,701
|
3,914
|
|
Operating property and equipment: | ||
Owned |
17,517
|
17,745
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(5,829)
|
(5,626)
|
11,688
|
12,119
|
|
Capital leases |
2,665
|
2,708
|
Accumulated amortization |
(693)
|
(653)
|
1,972
|
2,055
|
|
13,660
|
14,174
|
|
Other assets: | ||
Investments |
25
|
24
|
Intangibles, net |
395
|
399
|
Pension assets |
8
|
665
|
Aircraft lease deposits |
484
|
540
|
Prepaid rent |
155
|
158
|
Other, net |
779
|
831
|
1,846
|
2,617
|
|
$20,207
|
$20,705
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession)
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Financial Position (Unaudited)
(In Millions)
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|
|
Current liabilities: | ||
Current portions of long-term debt and | ||
capital lease obligations |
$ 888
|
$ 903
|
Advance ticket sales |
2,085
|
1,361
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits |
877
|
2,100
|
Accounts payable |
644
|
601
|
Fuel purchase commitments |
259
|
187
|
Other |
1,331
|
1,309
|
6,084
|
6,461
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
255
|
301
|
Other liabilities and deferred credits: | ||
Deferred pension liability |
105
|
2,333
|
Postretirement benefit liability |
1,948
|
1,920
|
Deferred income taxes |
485
|
389
|
Other |
939
|
946
|
3,477
|
5,588
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise |
18,662
|
16,035
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (See note) | ||
Stockholders' equity: | ||
Preferred stock |
-
|
-
|
Common stock at par |
1
|
1
|
Additional capital invested |
5,064
|
5,064
|
Retained deficit |
(10,446)
|
(7,946)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,423)
|
(3,332)
|
Treasury stock |
(1,467)
|
(1,467)
|
(8,271)
|
(7,680)
|
|
$20,207
|
$20,705
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession)
Statements of Consolidated Operations (Unaudited)
(In Millions, Except Per Share)
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
Operating revenues: | ||
Passenger - United Airlines |
$ 3,301
|
$ 3,248
|
Passenger - Regional Affiliates |
632
|
505
|
Cargo |
180
|
167
|
Other |
310
|
269
|
4,423
|
4,189
|
|
Operating expenses: | ||
Salaries and related costs |
1,052
|
1,208
|
Aircraft fuel |
955
|
693
|
Regional affiliates |
685
|
605
|
Purchased services |
383
|
370
|
Landing fees and other rent |
225
|
242
|
Aircraft maintenance |
227
|
193
|
Depreciation and amortization |
201
|
218
|
Cost of sales |
147
|
145
|
Aircraft rent |
109
|
134
|
Commissions |
76
|
81
|
Special operating items |
18
|
-
|
Other |
297
|
293
|
4,375
|
4,182
|
|
Earnings from operations |
48
|
7
|
Other income (expense): | ||
Interest expense |
(111)
|
(117)
|
Interest capitalized |
-
|
1
|
Interest income |
6
|
5
|
Reorganization items, net |
(1,386)
|
(144)
|
Miscellaneous, net |
9
|
-
|
(1,482)
|
(255)
|
|
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates |
(1,434)
|
(248)
|
Credit for income taxes |
-
|
-
|
Loss before equity in earnings of affiliates |
(1,434)
|
(248)
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
4
|
1
|
Net loss |
$(1,430)
|
$ (247)
|
Net loss per share, basic |
$(12.33)
|
$(2.25)
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession)
Statements of Consolidated Operations (Unaudited)
(In Millions, Except Per Share)
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
Operating revenues: | ||
Passenger - United Airlines |
$ 6,217
|
$ 6,239
|
Passenger - Regional Affiliates |
1,156
|
945
|
Cargo |
352
|
315
|
Other |
613
|
599
|
8,338
|
8,098
|
|
Operating expenses: | ||
Salaries and related costs |
2,085
|
2,457
|
Aircraft fuel |
1,760
|
1,296
|
Regional affiliates |
1,330
|
1,156
|
Purchased services |
744
|
722
|
Landing fees and other rent |
458
|
473
|
Aircraft maintenance |
446
|
378
|
Depreciation and amortization |
414
|
448
|
Cost of sales |
290
|
341
|
Aircraft rent |
229
|
271
|
Commissions |
153
|
162
|
Special operating items |
18
|
-
|
Other |
613
|
598
|
8,540
|
8,302
|
|
Loss from operations |
(202)
|
(204)
|
Other income (expense): | ||
Interest expense |
(220)
|
(237)
|
Interest capitalized |
(5)
|
1
|
Interest income |
10
|
15
|
Special non-operating items |
-
|
(13)
|
Reorganization items, net |
(2,154)
|
(274)
|
Miscellaneous, net |
67
|
8
|
(2,302)
|
(500)
|
|
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings/(losses) | ||
of affiliates |
(2,504)
|
(704)
|
Credit for income taxes |
-
|
-
|
Loss before equity in earnings/(losses) of affiliates |
(2,504)
|
(704)
|
Equity in earnings/(losses) of affiliates |
4
|
(2)
|
Net loss |
$(2,500)
|
$ (706)
|
Net loss per share, basic |
$(21.56)
|
$(6.42)
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession)
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In Millions)
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning | ||
of period, excluding restricted cash |
$ 1,223
|
$ 1,640
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
818
|
438
|
Cash flows from reorganization activities: | ||
Reorganization items, net |
(2,154)
|
(274)
|
Pension curtailments and settlements |
1,045
|
-
|
Increase in liabilities |
923
|
196
|
Other |
122
|
-
|
(64)
|
(78)
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||
Additions to property and equipment |
(97)
|
(150)
|
Proceeds on disposition of property and | ||
equipment |
35
|
13
|
Increase in restricted cash |
(91)
|
(159)
|
Decrease in short-term investments |
62
|
67
|
Other, net |
(31)
|
(49)
|
(122)
|
(278)
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||
Proceeds from DIP Financing |
-
|
10
|
Repayment of DIP Financing |
(10)
|
(241)
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
(113)
|
(89)
|
Principal payments under capital | ||
lease obligations |
(55)
|
(185)
|
Aircraft lease deposits, net |
-
|
160
|
(178)
|
(345)
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
454
|
(263)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period, | ||
excluding restricted cash |
$ 1,677
|
$ 1,377
|
Cash paid during the period for: | ||
Interest (net of amounts capitalized) |
$ 188
|
$ 296
|
Non-cash transactions: | ||
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on investments |
$ 17
|
$ (1)
|
Decrease in pension intangible assets |
$ 657
|
$ -
|
Increase in long-term debt incurred in connection with | ||
additions to other assets |
$ 21
|
$ 172
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company
UAL Corporation is a holding company and its principal, wholly owned subsidiary is United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("United"). We sometimes collectively refer to UAL Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, as "we," "our," "us," "UAL" or the "Company."
Interim Financial Statements
We prepared the consolidated financial statements shown here as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Some information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements that meet generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted as permitted by the SEC. We believe that the disclosures presented here are not misleading. The financial statements include all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments, reorganization items and other special charges described below) that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results. These financial statements should be read together with the information included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2004.
Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Considerations. On December 9, 2002 ("Petition Date"), UAL, United and 26 direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions to reorganize their businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Bankruptcy Court is jointly administering these cases as "In re UAL Corporation, et al., Case No. 02-B-48191." The consolidated financial statements shown here include certain subsidiaries that did not file to reorganize under Chapter 11. The assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee for the Northern District of Illinois appointed on December 13, 2002 an official committee of unsecured creditors (the "Creditors' Committee"). The Creditors' Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court concerning our reorganization. There can be no assurance that the Creditors' Committee will support our positions or our plan of reorganization, and any disagreements between the Creditors' Committee and us could protract the Chapter 11 process, hinder our ability to operate during the Chapter 11 process, and delay our emergence from Chapter 11.
With the exception of our non-filing subsidiaries, we continue to operate our businesses as "debtor-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and applicable court orders. In general, as debtor-in-possession, we are authorized under Chapter 11 to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
All vendors are being paid for all goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the ordinary course of business. However, under Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect most of our pre-petition liabilities are automatically stayed, except for liabilities relating to certain qualifying aircraft, aircraft engines and other aircraft-related equipment that are leased or subject to a security interest or conditional sale contract. Under Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect such aircraft-related pre-petition liabilities are automatically stayed for 60 days after the Petition Date (the stay of such actions in our case ended on February 7, 2003), except under two conditions: (a) the debtor may extend the 60-day period by agreement with the relevant financier and with court approval; or (b) the debtor may agree to perform all of the obligations under the applicable lease or financing and cure any defaults as required under the Bankruptcy Code. If neither of these conditions is met, the lessor or financier may demand the return of the aircraft and enforce any of its contractual rights or remedies to sell, lease or otherwise retain or dispose of such property.
We have negotiated with our aircraft lessors and lenders to restructure existing financings to reduce aircraft ownership costs to better reflect current market rates, and we have reached agreements in principle to restructure transactions with respect to a majority of our financed aircraft. However, the need for further cost reductions due to difficult conditions in the airline industry with substantially higher fuel prices has required us to re-examine some of these agreements and to seek to renegotiate certain of those financings, most importantly the financings associated with approximately 119 aircraft with a group of mostly-public financiers (the "Public Debt Group").
We have been in discussions with the Public Debt Group seeking to renegotiate an agreement in principle reached in the summer of 2004 from which we subsequently withdrew. Previously, the Bankruptcy Court issued a temporary restraining order ("TRO") that enjoined the repossession of six B737 and eight B767 aircraft. During the second quarter of 2005, the TRO was cancelled by court order. Dissolution of the TRO only affected the eight B767 aircraft as the Company had since rejected the leases for the six B737 aircraft. Subsequently, the Company returned four B767 aircraft and entered into a letter of intent to purchase the remaining four B767 aircraft. On July 15, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved the letter of intent and approved a separate agreement that enables the Company to finance a limited number of additional aircraft purchases.
On August 6, 2005, United entered into agreements in principle to restructure the financings for all of the aircraft in United's fleet that are controlled by the Public Debt Group, other than the 14 aircraft financed under the Series 1997-1 Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates ("EETC"), saving United approximately $300 million annually. These agreements, which are subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, are expected to secure United's long-term access to these aircraft, and resolve any related administrative claims. With respect to all the agreements reached with financiers since entering reorganization, and including the benefit of contractual changes and strategic fleet reductions, the Company will reduce its annual fleet costs by approximately $850 million since entering Chapter 11. In addition, with respect to those Public Debt Group financings for aircraft in United's fleet which were previously rejected, returned or repossessed, we have reached a global resolution of related administrative claims against the Company, subject to Bankruptcy Court approval. There can be no assurance that Bankruptcy Court approval for these agreements will be received.
United is also seeking to acquire the senior "A" tranche debt in the 1997-1 EETC transactions which would permit it to secure long-term access to the 14 aircraft subject to that financing. United had previously acquired the "B" and "C" tranches of this debt as a necessary predicate to purchasing the "A" tranche.
If the Company does not finalize
the agreements in principle with the Public Debt Group, our operational
and financial performance could be materially adversely affected, including
the possibility that one or more financiers may seek to repossess a significant
number of aircraft, or we may choose to reject or return such aircraft.
We have rejected or returned certain surplus aircraft to adjust our fleet size and composition to more closely match market demand, and are continuing this process to achieve an approximate fleet size of 455 aircraft in 2005. In addition, as part of ongoing negotiations with financiers, we have converted some long-term financing arrangements into operating leases of a reduced term and, in several instances, re-acquired previously rejected aircraft as circumstances warranted.
Under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, we may assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including leases of real property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. By order of the Bankruptcy Court, our Section 365 rights to assume, assume and assign, or reject unexpired leases of non-residential real estate expire on the earlier of the date of termination of our exclusive period to file a plan of reorganization (currently, September 1, 2005) or the date of the conclusion of a disclosure statement hearing in connection with a proposed plan of reorganization.
In general, if we reject an executory contract or unexpired lease, it is treated as a pre-petition breach of the lease or contract in question and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves us of performing any future obligations. However, such a rejection entitles the lessor or contract counterparty to a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach and accordingly, the counterparty may file a claim against us for such damages. As a result, liabilities subject to compromise are likely to change in the future as a result of damage claims created by our rejection of various aircraft, executory contracts and unexpired leases. Generally, if we assume an aircraft financing agreement, executory contract or unexpired lease, we are required to cure existing defaults under such contract or lease. We expect that the future assumption of certain executory contracts and unexpired leases may convert liabilities currently shown as subject to compromise to liabilities not subject to compromise.
To successfully emerge from Chapter 11, in addition to obtaining exit financing, the Bankruptcy Court must confirm a plan of reorganization, the filing of which will depend upon the timing and outcome of numerous ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 process. We had intended to file a plan of reorganization in early August 2005; however that filing was delayed at the request of the Creditors' Committee to allow the Committee more time to review the plan. We now expect to file a plan of reorganization in early September that provides for UAL's emergence from bankruptcy later in 2005 or early 2006, but there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will confirm the Company's plan of reorganization or that any such plan will be implemented successfully.
The Company's plan of reorganization will determine the rights and satisfaction of claims of various creditors and security holders. At this time, it is not possible to predict with certainty the effect of the Chapter 11 reorganization process on our business. We will include estimates of expected claims dispositions in our plan of reorganization, but the ultimate settlement of those claims will continue to be subject to the uncertain outcome of litigation, negotiations and Bankruptcy Court decisions up to and for a period of time after a plan of reorganization is confirmed. We believe that UAL's presently outstanding equity securities will have no value and will be canceled under any plan of reorganization that we propose. For this reason, we urge that caution be exercised with respect to existing and future investments in any UAL security.
Financial Statement Presentation. We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 90-7 "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code," ("SOP 90-7") and on a going-concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
SOP 90-7 requires that the
financial statements for periods subsequent to a Chapter 11 filing separate
transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization
from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, all transactions
(including, but not limited to all professional fees, realized gains and
losses and provisions for losses) directly associated with the reorganization
and restructuring of the business are reported separately in the financial
statements. For the three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2005
and 2004, we recognized the following reorganization expenses in our financial
statements:
(In millions) |
Ended June 30, |
Ended June 30, |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Pension related charges |
|
|
|
|
||
Contract rejection charges |
|
|
|
|
||
Aircraft rejection charges |
|
|
|
|
||
Professional fees |
|
|
|
|
||
Severance and employee retention |
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
In the first and second quarters of 2005, the Company recognized non-cash pension curtailment charges of $433 million and $207 million, respectively, associated with actions taken by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") to involuntarily terminate United Air Lines, Inc. Ground Employees' Retirement Plan (the "Ground Employees Plan"), United Airlines Flight Attendant Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the "Flight Attendant Plan") and United Airlines Management, Administrative and Public Contact Defined Benefit Pension Plan ("MAPC Plan"). The PBGC was appointed trustee for the Ground Employees Plan effective May 23, 2005 and the MAPC Plan and the Flight Attendant Plan effective June 30, 2005, assuming all rights and powers over the pension assets and obligations of each plan. Upon termination and settlement of these plans, the Company recognized a non-cash net settlement loss of approximately $395 million in accordance with SFAS No. 88, "Employer's Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits" ("SFAS 88"). In addition, during the second quarter of 2005 the Company recognized a non-cash settlement loss in the amount of $10 million for the termination of the non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for management employees who have benefits under the tax-qualified pension plan that cannot be paid due to Internal Revenue Code limits on compensation or benefits.
Contract rejection charges are non-cash costs that include our estimate of claims resulting from the Company's rejection of certain contract obligations such as executory contracts, unexpired leases, municipal bond obligations and regional carrier contracts. These claim amounts remain subject to future adjustments arising from negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, the determination as to the value of any collateral securing claims, proofs of claim or other events.
Aircraft rejection charges are non-cash costs that include our estimate of claims resulting from the Company's rejection of certain aircraft leases and return of aircraft as part of the bankruptcy process.
As we restructure aircraft financings as permitted by Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, our policy is to reflect the revised lease rates in aircraft rent once we have signed definitive term sheets for the financings and they have been approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
The Condensed Statements of Consolidated Financial Position distinguish pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise from both those pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities subject to compromise are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.
In addition, as a result of the Chapter 11 filing, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities, without substantial adjustments and/or changes in ownership, are subject to uncertainty. While operating as debtor-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11 and subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court and the terms of the applicable debtor-in-possession secured financing ("DIP Financing") covenants, or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business, we may sell or otherwise dispose of assets (including aircraft) and liquidate or settle liabilities for some amounts other than those reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Further, the forthcoming plan of reorganization is expected to materially change the amounts and classifications of certain assets and liabilities, as compared to amounts and classifications shown in the historical consolidated financial statements.
Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, we have filed schedules with the Bankruptcy Court identifying our assets and liabilities as of the Petition Date, while our creditors have filed proofs of claim with the Bankruptcy Court and we expect new claims to be filed in the future. Approximately 45,000 proofs of claim (including late-filed claims) have been filed so far with the Bankruptcy Court requesting payments from the Company. Through the claims resolution process we have identified many claims which we believe should be disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court, for a number of reasons such as our identification of claims that are duplicative, have been amended or superseded by later filed claims, are without merit, or are otherwise overstated. We have filed omnibus objections to many of these claims and will continue to file additional objections. As of June 30, 2005, approximately 31,000 of the total claims have either been withdrawn by the claimants or disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court.
As of June 30, 2005, approximately 14,000 proofs of claim totaling $45.7 billion remain filed with the Bankruptcy Court. The remaining amount of the proofs of claim filed continues to far exceed our estimate of ultimate liability. Differences in amount between claims filed by creditors and liabilities shown in our records continue to be investigated and resolved in connection with our claims resolution process. While we have made significant progress to date, we expect this process to continue for some time, and to continue beyond the date of confirmation of a plan of reorganization. We believe that further resolution of claims is necessary for us to determine with more precision the likely range of creditor distributions under a proposed plan of reorganization. We have recorded liability amounts for the claims that can be reasonably estimated and which we believe are probable of being allowed by the Bankruptcy Court and we have classified these as liabilities subject to compromise in the attached Condensed Statements of Consolidated Financial Position. We will include estimates of expected claims dispositions in our plan of reorganization, although we expect those estimates to be further revised as the bankruptcy process continues.
We will continue to evaluate existing and new claims filed and will make adjustments, as appropriate. To date, such adjustments have been material and we anticipate that future adjustments will be material as well.
DIP Financing. In connection with the Chapter 11 filings, the Company arranged DIP Financing. As of June 30, 2005, the DIP Financing consisted of a $1.0 billion facility of which $900 million was available due to a $100 million reserve for collateral maintenance and liquidation expenses. The facility included a revolving credit and letter of credit facility of $200 million and a term loan of $800 million, and was scheduled to mature on September 30, 2005. We had the option of borrowing under the DIP Financing at an interest rate of the prime rate plus 3.5% or LIBOR plus 4.5% plus mutually agreed fees. As of June 30, 2005, we had outstanding borrowings of $853 million at a rate of 9.5%. In addition, letters of credit were issued under the DIP Financing in an aggregate amount of $37 million. We were required to maintain a minimum unrestricted cash balance of $750 million.
On July 15, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved an agreement with the DIP Financing lenders to increase the term loan to $1.1 billion for a total facility of $1.3 billion; extend the maturity date and the effectiveness of financial covenants to December 30, 2005 with the option to further extend the maturity date until March 31, 2006 if certain conditions are satisfied; reduce the interest rate to the prime rate plus 3.25% or LIBOR plus 4.25%; maintain a minimum unrestricted cash balance of at least $750 million; waive certain events of default related to certain technical matters; and provide for a new capital expenditure basket for certain aircraft purchases, including a cash sublimit, but requiring financing for the balance of the aggregate purchase price of such aircraft.
The Company is proposing to enter into an amendment to the DIP financing which would provide for, among other things, a waiver of any event of default as a result of the Company acquiring the Tranche A, Tranche B and Tranche C indebtedness under the Series 1997-1 Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates. The proposed amendment further provides for the refinancing of a majority of that indebtedness, as secured by up to 14 aircraft to be acquired in connection with the acquisition of that indebtedness. This proposed amendment will require the approval of the DIP financing lenders and the Bankruptcy Court. There can be no assurance that either approval will be received. For more information on the terms of the proposed amendment, please see the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005.
The terms of the DIP Financing include covenants that require us to satisfy ongoing monthly financial requirements, including minimum earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and aircraft rents ("EBITDAR") thresholds, limitations on capital expenditures and minimum unrestricted cash. Failure to comply with these covenants would constitute an event of default under the DIP Financing and allow the lenders to accelerate the loan. The Company complied with the EBITDAR covenant in April, May and June 2005.
Borrowing availability is determined by a formula based on a percentage of eligible assets. The eligible assets consist of certain previously unencumbered aircraft, spare engines, spare parts inventory, certain flight simulators and quick engine change kits. The underlying value of such assets may fluctuate periodically due to prevailing market conditions and fluctuations in value may have an impact on the borrowing availability under the DIP Financing. Availability may be further limited by additional reserves imposed by the lending banks in their commercially reasonable discretion.
The DIP Financing is guaranteed by UAL and all other filing subsidiaries and is secured by first priority liens on all unencumbered present and future assets and by junior liens on all other assets, other than certain specified assets, including assets which are subject to financing agreements that are entitled to the benefits of Section 1110 and to the extent such financing agreements prohibit such junior liens.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123R") which establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in exchange for stock options or share-based payments. SFAS 123R requires that the compensation cost (as measured by the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued) relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123") and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"). Currently we account for stock options under APB 25 as permitted by SFAS 123. SFAS 123R is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period of the Company's first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company will recognize compensation expense for its participation in stock-based compensation plans for the portion of outstanding awards for which the employee service has not yet been rendered, based on the grant date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS 123R. We anticipate the adoption of SFAS 123R will not have a material impact on our financial statements while we are in bankruptcy.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" ("FIN47"). FIN47 clarifies the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", and addresses the diverse accounting practices that have developed with respect to the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset when the timing and (or) method of settlement of the obligation are conditional on a future event. In addition, FIN47 clarifies that an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability's fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN47 is effective no later than the end of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. Currently, we are evaluating the impact of FIN47 on our financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" ("SFAS 154"). This statement, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes", and FASB Statement No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements", requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retroactively to all prior period financial statements presented, unless it is impractical to do so. SFAS 154 also provides that a change in method of depreciating or amortizing a long-lived non-financial asset be accounted for as a change in estimate effected by a change in accounting principle, and also provides that correction of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a "restatement". SFAS 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 154 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In accordance with SOP 90-7, we are required to adopt all new accounting pronouncements upon emergence from bankruptcy, if they have effective dates within one year of the date of adoption of fresh-start reporting.
Per Share Amounts
Basic loss per share amounts
were computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during the year.
Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders (in millions) |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$(1,430)
|
$ (247)
|
$ (2,500)
|
$ (706)
|
Preferred stock dividend requirements |
(3)
|
(3)
|
(5)
|
(5)
|
Loss attributable to common stockholders |
$(1,433)
|
$ (250)
|
$ (2,505)
|
$ (711)
|
Shares (in millions) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
116.2
|
110.9
|
116.2
|
110.8
|
Loss Per Share |
$(12.33)
|
$ (2.25)
|
$ (21.56)
|
$ (6.42)
|
At June 30, 2005 and 2004, stock options to purchase approximately 9 million and 11 million shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of earnings per share because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore, the effect of such shares would be antidilutive. As of June 30, 2004, all remaining shares of convertible ESOP preferred stock had been converted to common shares.
Stock Option Accounting
At June 30, 2005, we had certain stock-based employee compensation plans. We account for these plans under APB 25 and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost for stock options is reflected in our financial statements as provided under APB 25, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
If compensation cost for
stock-based employee compensation plans had been determined using the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 we would have reported our net
loss and loss per share as the pro forma amounts shown below:
(In millions, except per share) |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported |
$ (1,430)
|
$ (247)
|
$ (2,500)
|
$ (706)
|
Less: Total compensation expense determined under | ||||
fair value method |
(1)
|
(3)
|
(2)
|
(5)
|
Net loss, pro forma |
$ (1,431)
|
$ (250)
|
$ (2,502)
|
$ (711)
|
Net loss per share, basic | ||||
As reported |
$ (12.33)
|
$ (2.25)
|
$ (21.56)
|
$ (6.42)
|
Pro forma |
$ (12.34)
|
$ (2.27)
|
$ (21.57)
|
$ (6.46)
|
Income Taxes
Beginning in the third quarter of 2002, we established a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax asset. Thus, UAL has a zero percent effective tax rate for both 2005 and 2004. As of June 30, 2005, our valuation allowance totaled $3.7 billion. Further, we have determined that it is more likely than not that our gross deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances at June 30, 2005, will be realized through the reversals of existing deferred tax credits.
Retirement and Postretirement Plans
Our net periodic benefit
cost included the following components for the three-month and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
(In millions) | Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
$ 23
|
$ 62
|
$ 10
|
$ 16
|
|||
Interest cost |
174
|
197
|
30
|
42
|
|||
Expected return on plan assets |
(146)
|
(175)
|
(3)
|
(3)
|
|||
Amortization of prior service cost | |||||||
including transition obligation/(asset) |
6
|
20
|
(34)
|
(26)
|
|||
Curtailment charge |
207
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Settlement losses, net |
405
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Recognized actuarial loss |
38
|
23
|
22
|
23
|
|||
Net periodic benefit costs |
$ 707
|
$ 127
|
$ 25
|
$ 52
|
(In millions) | Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
$ 61
|
$ 120
|
$ 22
|
$ 27
|
|||
Interest cost |
395
|
395
|
65
|
92
|
|||
Expected return on plan assets |
(328)
|
(355)
|
(5)
|
(5)
|
|||
Amortization of prior service cost | |||||||
including transition obligation/(asset) |
14
|
40
|
(72)
|
(51)
|
|||
Curtailment charge |
640
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Settlement losses, net |
390
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Recognized actuarial loss |
85
|
50
|
48
|
51
|
|||
Net periodic benefit costs |
$ 1,257
|
$ 250
|
$ 58
|
$ 114
|
Effective July 2004, the Company ceased making contributions to its qualified defined benefit pension plans.
Historically, the Company has maintained a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for management employees who have benefits under the tax-qualified pension plan that cannot be paid due to Internal Revenue Code limits on compensation or benefits. In June 2003, we terminated all participation and benefit payments under the non-qualified plan for those participants who had terminated employment with the Company prior to December 9, 2002. Effective February 28, 2005, we terminated the non-qualified supplemental plan for all remaining participants and, during the six months ended June 30, 2005, recorded a small net settlement gain.
In the first and second quarter of 2005, the Company recognized pension curtailment charges of $433 million and $207 million, respectively, associated with actions taken by the PBGC to involuntarily terminate the Company's defined benefit pension plans for the Ground Employees Plan as of March 11, 2005 and for the MAPC Plan and the Flight Attendant Plan as of June 30, 2005. These pension plans were projected to have benefit obligations and plan assets aggregating approximately $8.0 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2004. In May 2005, the PBGC was appointed trustee for the Ground Employees Plan and in June 2005, the PBGC was appointed trustee for the MAPC Plan and the Flight Attendant Plan, assuming all rights and powers over the pension assets and obligations. Upon termination and settlement of these plans, the Company recognized a net settlement loss of approximately $395 million in accordance with SFAS 88.
SOP 90-7 requires that pre-petition liabilities, including claims that become known after a petition is filed, be reported on the basis of the expected amount of the claim allowed rather than the amounts for which those claims might be settled. Management is not able at this time to precisely estimate the PBGC's probable claims to be allowed from the terminations of the Ground Employee Plan, MAPC Plan or the Flight Attendant Plan until a plan of reorganization is approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Historically, bankruptcy courts have allowed pension termination claims based on either PBGC assumptions or prudent investor assumptions. Management has estimated that the range of probable allowable claims may be as high as $7.2 billion using the PBGC's statutory assumptions (as defined by ERISA regulations) for estimating the net pension obligation and may be as low as $1.9 billion using the prudent investor's assumptions. The prudent investor assumptions use a discount rate which is based upon the selection of a set of investments by a prudent investor which would produce a return achievable in the market as a whole. Management concluded that a prudent investor rate of 8.00% was appropriate for estimating the low end of the range of potential allowable claims.
In accordance with SFAS No.
5, "Accounting for Contingencies", and FASB Interpretation No. 14,
"Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of Loss", if management can
estimate the range of the probable allowable claim, but no specific value
within the range is more probable than any other, the lowest value in the
range of the probable loss should be recorded. As such, a $1.9 billion
allowable claim for the PBGC was recorded in the second quarter of 2005
and classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise on the Condensed
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position. The Company has a contractual
obligation to support the PBGC's claim that was calculated with statutory
assumptions. The Company expects that the PBGC's claim will be objected
to and cannot predict the amount of the claim the Bankruptcy Court will
ultimately allow.
Restricted Cash
At June 30, 2005, UAL had $968 million in restricted cash, primarily representing security for workers' compensation obligations, security deposits for airport leases and reserves with institutions that process our credit card ticket sales. There can be no assurance that these institutions will not require additional levels of security deposits or reserve holdbacks. In the second quarter of 2005, one such institution increased their level of reserve holdbacks by approximately $84 million.
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
Liabilities subject to compromise refers to both secured and unsecured obligations which will be accounted for under a plan of reorganization, including claims incurred prior to the Petition Date. They represent the estimated amount expected to be allowed on known or potential claims to be resolved through the Chapter 11 process, and remain subject to future adjustments arising from negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, the determination as to the value of any collateral securing claims, proofs of claim or other events. To date, such adjustments, as reflected in reorganization expense, have been material and we anticipate that future adjustments will be material as well.
Differences between liability amounts we have estimated and claims filed by our creditors are being investigated and the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination of the allowable claims. The determination of how these liabilities will ultimately be treated will not be known until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of reorganization and the claims resolution process is complete, which may occur well after confirmation of a plan of reorganization. We will continue to evaluate the amounts of these liabilities through the remainder of the Chapter 11 process. To the extent that we identify additional amounts subject to compromise, we will recognize them accordingly. As a result, the amounts of liabilities subject to compromise are subject to change.
At June 30, 2005, we had
liabilities subject to compromise of $18.7 billion consisting of the following:
(In millions) | ||
Long-term debt, including accrued interest |
$ 7,051
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans |
4,434
|
|
Aircraft-related accruals and deferred gains |
3,916
|
|
Capital lease obligations, including accrued interest |
1,670
|
|
Accounts payable |
292
|
|
Early termination fees |
162
|
|
Other |
1,137
|
|
$18,662
|
Segment Information
We have five reportable segments
that reflect the management of our business: North America, the Pacific,
the Atlantic, Latin America and UAL Loyalty Services, LLC ("ULS"). For
internal management and decision-making purposes, we have allocated expenses
and revenues (as incorporated in our consolidated financial statements)
to these segments as follows:
($ In millions) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
2,711
|
801
|
555
|
121
|
207
|
14
|
14
|
4,423
|
|
Intersegment revenue |
70
|
23
|
16
|
3
|
16
|
21
|
(149)
|
-
|
|
Earnings (loss) before | |||||||||
special items and | |||||||||
reorganization items |
(150)
|
(15)
|
34
|
(14)
|
100
|
19
|
-
|
(26)
|
($ In millions) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
2,657
|
693
|
530
|
106
|
196
|
7
|
-
|
4,189
|
Intersegment revenue |
103
|
26
|
20
|
4
|
12
|
(27)
|
(138)
|
-
|
Earnings (loss) before | ||||||||
reorganization items |
(161)
|
12
|
19
|
(6)
|
74
|
(41)
|
-
|
(103)
|
($ In millions) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
5,105
|
1,494
|
1,016
|
246
|
450
|
27
|
-
|
8,338
|
Intersegment revenue |
139
|
47
|
32
|
8
|
33
|
21
|
(280)
|
-
|
Earnings (loss) before | ||||||||
special items and | ||||||||
reorganization items |
(468)
|
(44)
|
(11)
|
(32)
|
193
|
34
|
-
|
(328)
|
($ In millions) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
5,190
|
1,300
|
979
|
222
|
392
|
15
|
-
|
8,098
|
Intersegment revenue |
169
|
43
|
32
|
7
|
25
|
(26)
|
(250)
|
-
|
Earnings (loss) before | ||||||||
special items and | ||||||||
reorganization items |
(514)
|
(3)
|
(7)
|
(13)
|
138
|
(20)
|
-
|
(419)
|
Beginning in the third quarter of 2004, our Statements of Consolidated Operations reflect reclassifications of regional carrier revenue and expenses in order to provide better presentation of results of operations for United Airlines mainline and United Express (Regional affiliates). Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. The effect of these reclassifications on reportable segments for the three-month and six-month periods of 2004 from amounts previously reported on our Form 10-Q was an increase of $177 and $148 million, respectively, to North America revenue.
A reconciliation of the total
amounts reported by reportable segments to the applicable amounts in the
consolidated financial statements follows:
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Total loss for reportable segments |
$ (45)
|
$ (62)
|
$ (362)
|
$ (399)
|
Special items |
(18)
|
-
|
(18)
|
(13)
|
Reorganization items, net |
(1,386)
|
(144)
|
(2,154)
|
(274)
|
Other UAL subsidiary earnings and | ||||
intersegment eliminations |
19
|
(41)
|
34
|
(20)
|
Net loss |
$(1,430)
|
$ (247)
|
$(2,500)
|
$ (706)
|
The Company's dedicated revenue-producing assets (primarily aircraft) generally can be deployed in any of its reportable segments, while ULS had $1.3 billion in total assets as of June 30, 2005.
Comprehensive Income
We include in other comprehensive income changes in minimum pension liabilities and changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments which qualify for hedge accounting. For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, total comprehensive income (loss) amounted to $443 million and $(248) million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, total comprehensive income (loss) amounted to $(591) million and $(708) million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 included a $1,891 million net adjustment relating to the termination of various pension plans, as discussed in Pension and Postretirement Plans.
Special Items
During the second quarter of 2005, we recognized a charge of $18 million for aircraft impairments related to the planned accelerated retirement of certain aircraft currently operated by Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation ("AWAC").
During the first quarter of 2004, we incurred a $13 million charge in non-operating expense for the write-down of certain non-operating B767 aircraft.
Aircraft Fuel Hedges
Aircraft fuel represented 22% and 21%, respectively, of our total operating expenses for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005.
Our strategy to hedge a portion of our price risk related to projected jet fuel requirements primarily involves using collar options. The collars (only some of which were designated as cash flow hedges) involve the purchase of fuel call options with the simultaneous sale of fuel put options with identical expiration dates. Those contracts designated as hedges are recorded at fair value, with the changes in fair value, to the extent they are effective, recorded in other comprehensive income until the underlying hedged fuel is consumed. To the extent that the designated hedges are ineffective, gain or loss is recognized currently. The fair value of each designated hedge is determined by the use of standard option value models using commodity-related assumptions derived from prices observed in underlying markets. For those contracts not designated as hedges, the related gain or loss is recognized currently as an element of non-operating income. In the three months ending June 30, 2005, the Company recognized a loss of $1 million (which included income of $1.2 million relating to the options' time-value and a loss of $2.5 million as a result of ineffective hedges) in non-operating income. In addition, in the six months ending June 30, 2005, the Company recognized income of $40 million (which included income of $5 million relating to the options' time-value and hedge ineffectiveness being immaterial) in non-operating income.
We have hedged approximately 8% of our remaining 2005 projected fuel requirements at an average price of $1.24 per gallon, excluding taxes. These contracts will expire through December 31, 2005. The current fair value of our designated hedge position is approximately $21 million as of June 30, 2005 and is included in other comprehensive income. We expect that this entire amount, to the extent it remains effective, will be recognized into earnings over the second half of 2005 as a reduction to fuel expense. We plan to continue to hedge future fuel purchases as circumstances and market conditions allow.
Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to common commercial lease transactions, we have entered into numerous long-term agreements to lease certain airport and maintenance facilities that are financed through tax-exempt special facility revenue bonds ("municipal bonds") and issued by various local municipalities to build or improve airport and maintenance facilities.
During 2003, we filed four complaints for declaratory judgment and corresponding motions for temporary restraining orders concerning United's municipal bond obligations for facilities at Denver International Airport ("DEN"), John F. Kennedy International Airport ("JFK"), San Francisco International Airport ("SFO"), and Los Angeles International Airport ("LAX"). In each case, we sought clarification of our obligations to pay principal and interest under the applicable municipal bonds, and the protection of our rights concerning related airport lease agreements at the applicable airports.
On March 30, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court granted our motions for summary judgment with respect to the JFK, SFO and LAX municipal bonds, holding that our payment obligations related to municipal bonds financing airport improvements at these sites which were not obligations arising under "leases" pursuant to Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. Based on this ruling, the outstanding $248 million in principal in connection with these municipal bonds was considered pre-petition debt and the applicable accrued rent has been classified as liabilities subject to compromise.
In our adversary proceeding involving DEN, however, the Bankruptcy Court did not grant our motion for summary judgment. Rather, the Bankruptcy Court found that our payment obligations for the municipal bonds financing airport improvements at DEN (which represents approximately $261 million in principal) were obligations arising under a true lease. We have appealed the adverse ruling of the DEN proceeding, but in accordance with the Bankruptcy Court's order, we have paid $45 million into escrow for the semi-annual interest payments due for the DEN municipal bonds.
The defendants in the JFK, SFO and LAX adversary proceedings also appealed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ("District Court"). In November 2004, the District Court reversed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling and held in favor of the defendants in the SFO adversary proceeding. In January 2005, the District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling with respect to the DEN adversary proceeding and reversed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling with respect to the LAX adversary proceeding. On February 18, 2005, the District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling in the Company's favor in the JFK adversary proceeding.
The Company has appealed the District Court's ruling with respect to the SFO, LAX and DEN adversary proceedings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and the defendants have appealed the ruling in the Company's favor in the JFK matter. On July 26, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court's ruling with respect to the SFO adversary proceeding, but the defendants may petition the court for a rehearing or a writ of certiorari. The outcome of these appeals remains uncertain and, therefore, the ultimate treatment of these municipal bond obligations in reorganization is uncertain. In accordance with the Bankruptcy Court's order, we have paid $10 million and $22 million into escrow for the interest payments due for the LAX and SFO municipal bonds, respectively.
Similarly, in September 2003, we filed a complaint for declaratory judgment for all seven municipal bond issues (which represent approximately $601 million in principal) relating to our facilities at Chicago O'Hare International Airport ("O'Hare"), seeking, among other things, a declaration that a certain cross-default provision in the O'Hare airport lease is unenforceable. On February 15, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved an agreement ("O'Hare Settlement Agreement") resolving the disputes between United, the trustees and the bondholders that in effect reduced the Company's indebtedness related to these bond issues from approximately $601 million to approximately $150 million. The City of Chicago, a party to these adversary proceedings, is not a party to the O'Hare Settlement Agreement.
The O'Hare Settlement Agreement requires the indenture trustees and certain designated bondholders to waive any existing defaults with respect to the bonds, and not to seek any further payment on account of the bonds beyond the consideration set forth in the O'Hare Settlement Agreement. It requires the Company, in connection with the confirmation of its plan of reorganization, to relinquish any claims to certain unused construction fund monies (which currently total approximately $65 million) and to issue convertible debt to the counterparties in the O'Hare Settlement Agreement, upon emergence from bankruptcy of the reorganized UAL Corporation, having a par value of $150 million.
As of June 30, 2005, the Company had paid into escrow cash payments totaling approximately $22 million related to interest due on three of the seven O'Hare municipal bonds for semi-annual interest payments that were purported to have come due during the pendency of the Chapter 11 reorganization. As part of the O'Hare Settlement Agreement, these escrow funds, less the legal fees of the trustees and certain holders, will be remitted back to the Company.
On August 7, 2005, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the City of Chicago, with respect to all unresolved disputes relating to our facilities at O'Hare. The agreement in principle, which will require definitive documentation and the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, provides for certain utilization and accommodation requirements with respect to the Company's gates at O'Hare that could result in the loss of access to certain gates if United fails to maintain a minimum utilization standard. The Company expects to meet the minimum utilization standard. There can be no assurance at this time that a definitive agreement will be reached, or that Bankruptcy Court approval of this agreement will be received.
UAL has certain contingencies resulting from litigation and claims (including environmental issues) incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after considering a number of factors, including (but not limited to) the views of legal counsel, the nature of contingencies to which we are subject and prior experience, that the ultimate disposition of these contingencies will not materially affect the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.
We record liabilities for legal and environmental claims against us in accordance with GAAP. These amounts are recorded based on our assessments of the likelihood of their eventual settlements. The amounts of these liabilities could increase or decrease in the near term, based on revisions to estimates relating to the various claims. In addition, as a result of the bankruptcy filing, as of the Petition Date, virtually all pending litigation is stayed, and absent further order of the Bankruptcy Court, no party, subject to certain exceptions, may take any action, again subject to certain exceptions, to recover on pre-petition claims against us. Accordingly, we have classified certain of these liabilities as liabilities subject to compromise.
The Company anticipates that if found liable, its damages from claims arising from the events of September 11, 2001 will be significant; however, we believe that, under the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act of 2001, our liability will be limited to our insurance coverage.
At June 30, 2005, commitments for the purchase of property and equipment, principally aircraft, approximated $1.7 billion, after deducting advance payments. Since September 11, 2001, we have reached agreements with the aircraft manufacturers enabling us to delay or cancel delivery of future orders. Since resetting our fleet plan is critical to our overall restructuring, we continue to hold discussions regarding these deliveries. Our current commitments would require the payment of an estimated $0.1 billion for the remainder of 2005, $0.1 billion in 2006, $0.4 billion in 2007, $0.5 billion in 2008 and $0.6 billion in 2009 and thereafter primarily for the purchase of A319 and A320 aircraft. It is likely that the amount and timing of these obligations will change, and could potentially be eliminated in their entirety. Additionally, the disposition of advance payments to the manufacturers and aircraft financiers of $127 million is subject to the ultimate outcome of these discussions.
UAL Loyalty Services, LLC
In 2005, the Bankruptcy Court
approved a corporate restructuring that (a) moved Ameniti Travel Clubs,
Inc (formerly known as Confetti, Inc.) as a subsidiary of ULS to a subsidiary
of MyPoints.com, Inc. ("MyPoints"), (b) moved MyPoints as a subsidiary
of ULS to a subsidiary of UAL, and (c) moved ULS as a subsidiary of UAL
to a subsidiary of United. This restructuring was completed on March 21,
2005 and resulted in a change in classification of certain operating revenues
that are associated with our Mileage Plus program as follows:
Increase/(decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | ||
Operating revenues: | ||
Passenger - United Airlines |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Chapter 11 Restructuring Efforts
The following sections describe details of restructuring efforts underway by the Company in the areas of labor agreements, defined benefit pension plans, aircraft financings, future operating fleet redeployment and reductions, municipal bond obligations, and the ongoing bankruptcy claims resolution process. See "Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the reorganization process.
In the summer of 2004, we identified a further $2 billion in required future annual cash savings (to be fully realized by fiscal year 2007) that we believe are necessary to attract exit financing and to emerge from reorganization later in 2005. We have amended our collective bargaining agreements ("CBAs") and reduced our non-represented salaried and management employees' compensation and benefits to achieve approximately $700 million in average annual labor savings toward the $2 billion goal. We are seeking operational savings and the termination and replacement of defined benefit pension plans to achieve the remainder of the $2 billion savings target.
Labor Restructuring. Effective January 1, 2005, the Company reduced the compensation of its non-represented salaried and management employees and announced changes to benefits and productivity for this group. The Company has also negotiated consensual modifications to its CBAs with each of its labor unions to achieve further average annual labor savings. On January 31, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved amended CBAs between the Company and the Association of Flight Attendants ("AFA"), the Air Line Pilots Association ("ALPA"), the Professional Airline Flight Control Association ("PAFCA"), and the Transport Workers Union ("TWU") (all of whom had their memberships ratify such amendments). On May 31, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved an amended CBA between the Company and AMFA and subsequently, on July 22, 2005, approved an amended CBA between the Company and IAM, both of which were ratified by their memberships.
The Company has also agreed to provide each employee group a portion of the equity, securities or other consideration provided to general unsecured creditors under any plan of reorganization proposed or supported by the Company. Each employee group is to receive a distribution based on the value of cost savings provided by that group. Approval of this distribution is subject to the Bankruptcy Court process.
The Company has agreed to provide to employees represented by ALPA, PAFCA, TWU, AMFA and IAM as well as its salaried and management employees, approximately $706 million in convertible notes upon the emergence of the Company from bankruptcy in the event the groups' defined benefit pension plans are terminated. All represented groups other than the AFA have agreed to eliminate any requirements in their respective CBAs to maintain, and not to oppose efforts by the Company to terminate, each of their respective defined benefit pension plans.
Pensions. The Company determined that to obtain exit financing and successfully reorganize and emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, it was necessary to terminate and replace all of its defined benefit pension plans. To this end, on April 22, 2005, United and the PBGC entered into a global settlement agreement which provides for the settlement and compromise of various disputes and controversies with respect to four defined benefit pension plans of United, including the United Airlines Pilot Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the "Pilot Plan"), Flight Attendant Plan, Ground Employees Plan and the MAPC Plan (collectively, the "Pension Plans"). On May 10, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved the settlement agreement, including modifications requested by certain creditors. The AFA and several other parties have filed legal challenges to the approval of the PBGC agreement by the Bankruptcy Court. To date, no such challenges have been successful, although several remain pending.
On May 23, 2005, the PBGC assumed responsibility for the Ground Employees Plan. On June 30, 2005, the PBGC assumed responsibility for the Flight Attendant Plan and the MAPC Plan. The PBGC and the Company have executed termination and trusteeship agreements with respect to each of these plans. The Company thus has no further duties or rights with respect to these plans. The Pilot Pension Plan termination date will be as specified in the settlement agreement and PBGC will not become statutory trustee until all issues referenced in the settlement agreement are resolved. The PBGC has moved for summary judgment on the termination of the Pilot Plan; a hearing has been scheduled before the Bankruptcy Court for August 18, 2005.
Under the settlement agreement, the Company has agreed to propose a plan of reorganization that provides for the distribution of the following consideration to the PBGC:
The distribution of these securities to the PBGC is subject to a "safety valve" provision that allows for modifications to the terms of the securities to the extent that such terms are materially impairing, hindering or delaying the Company's ability to obtain the necessary financing to exit bankruptcy.
The PBGC agreed to waive its pension restoration rights, provided that the Company obtains the PBGC's consent with respect to any defined contribution plan proposed to be provided by the Company to its employees following termination of the Pension Plans. The Company could elect to implement a defined contribution plan without the PBGC's consent, but under those circumstances, the PBGC would retain its restoration rights.
Additionally, the Company has agreed to propose a plan of reorganization that provides the PBGC with a single pre-petition general unsecured unfunded liability claim arising from the termination of the Pension Plans. At the Company's option, the PBGC will assign 45% of the distribution it receives from this claim as directed by the Company; provided that the Company's direction of this assignment must be (1) consistent with the best interests of general unsecured creditors, (2) subject to at least 10 business days prior notice to the Creditors' Committee and after consultation with the Committee, and (3) subject to Bankruptcy Court approval under the best interest of creditors' test in a de novo review. If the Company does not comply with the above, the distribution will be directed to the unsecured creditors.
On November 30, 2004, Independent Fiduciary Services, Inc. ("IFS"), the independent fiduciary appointed by the Company, filed a motion in the Bankruptcy Court requesting the allowance of a $288 million to $993 million administrative claim against the Company for unpaid minimum funding contributions. On March 18, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court ruled that only those contributions arising from pension benefits associated with service performed by participants in the post-petition period would be considered an administrative claim. IFS is appealing this decision. Because the settlement agreement shall be deemed to have settled and released any claims by the PBGC on its own behalf or on behalf of the Pension Plans arising from or related to any minimum funding obligations (subject to certain terms and conditions), it also provides for United to terminate the IFS agreement, and for the PBGC to support the Company's actions in certain circumstances. On May 27, 2005, the Company provided notice to IFS of its intent to terminate the Fiduciary Services Agreement between the Company and IFS with respect to each of the Company's Pension Plans effective on the later of: (a) July 27, 2005 or (b) the termination date for each such plan, respectively. The Company and the PBGC have entered into trusteeship agreements for the Flight Attendant Plan, Ground Employees Plan, and MAPC Plan, with effective dates of June 30, March 11, and June 30, 2005, respectively. Thus, as of July 27, 2005, IFS is no longer independent fiduciary for the Flight Attendant Plan, Ground Employees Plan or the MAPC Plan that were the subject of IFS's Motion.
On June 24, 2005, the House of Representatives passed an amendment to a spending bill that seeks to prevent the PBGC from using appropriated funds to enforce or implement the settlement agreement. The Senate must also still act on this legislation, which is not yet scheduled. We do not believe this legislation will have any effect in its present form.
The AFA has stated that they may engage in self-help in response to the PBGC's involuntarily termination of the Flight Attendant Plan. Such self-help could take the form of intermittent disruptions to United's operations, which could adversely affect future bookings on United. The Company has communicated to the AFA that it believes that any disruption to the airline's operations would be illegal and that it intends to vigorously prosecute parties taking such actions.
Section 1110 Aircraft Restructuring. All vendors are being paid for all goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the ordinary course of business. However, under Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect most of our pre-petition liabilities are automatically stayed, except for liabilities relating to certain qualifying aircraft, aircraft engines and other aircraft-related equipment that are leased or subject to a security interest or conditional sale contract. Under Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect such aircraft-related pre-petition liabilities are automatically stayed for 60 days after the Petition Date (the stay of such actions in our case ended on February 7, 2003), except under two conditions: (a) the debtor may extend the 60-day period by agreement with the relevant financier and with court approval; or (b) the debtor may agree to perform all of the obligations under the applicable lease or financing and cure any defaults as required under the Bankruptcy Code. If neither of these conditions is met, the lessor or financier may demand the return of the aircraft and enforce any of its contractual rights or remedies to sell, lease or otherwise retain or dispose of such property.
We have negotiated with our aircraft lessors and lenders to restructure existing financings to reduce aircraft ownership costs to better reflect current market rates, and we have reached agreements in principle to restructure transactions with respect to a majority of our financed aircraft. However, the need for further cost reductions due to difficult conditions in the airline industry with substantially higher fuel prices has required us to re-examine some of these agreements and to seek to renegotiate certain of those financings, most importantly the financings associated with approximately 119 aircraft with a group of mostly-public financiers (the "Public Debt Group").
We have been in discussions with the Public Debt Group seeking to renegotiate an agreement in principle reached in the summer of 2004 from which we subsequently withdrew. Previously, the Bankruptcy Court issued a temporary restraining order ("TRO") that enjoined the repossession of six B737 and eight B767 aircraft. During the second quarter of 2005, the TRO was cancelled by court order. Dissolution of the TRO only affected the eight B767 aircraft as the Company had since rejected the leases for the six B737 aircraft. Subsequently, the Company returned four B767 aircraft and entered into a letter of intent to purchase the remaining four B767 aircraft. On July 15, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved the letter of intent and approved a separate agreement that enables the Company to finance a limited number of additional aircraft purchases.
On August 6, 2005, United entered into agreements in principle to restructure the financings for all of the aircraft in United's fleet that are controlled by the Public Debt Group, other than the 14 aircraft financed under the Series 1997-1 Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates ("EETC"), saving United approximately $300 million annually. These agreements, which are subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, are expected to secure United's long-term access to these aircraft, and resolve any related administrative claims. With respect to all the agreements reached with financiers since entering reorganization, and including the benefit of contractual changes and strategic fleet reductions, the Company will reduce its annual fleet costs by approximately $850 million since entering Chapter 11. In addition, with respect to those Public Debt Group financings for aircraft in United's fleet which were previously rejected, returned or repossessed, we have reached a global resolution of related administrative claims against the Company, subject to Bankruptcy Court approval. There can be no assurance that Bankruptcy Court approval for these agreements will be received.
United is also seeking to acquire the senior "A" tranche debt in the 1997-1 EETC transactions which would permit it to secure long-term access to the 14 aircraft subject to that financing. United had previously acquired the "B" and "C" tranches of this debt as a necessary predicate to purchasing the "A" tranche.
If the Company does not finalize the agreements in principle with the Public Debt Group, our operational and financial performance could be materially adversely affected, including the possibility that one or more financiers may seek to repossess a significant number of aircraft, or we may choose to reject or return such aircraft.
We have rejected or returned certain surplus aircraft to adjust our fleet size and composition to more closely match market demand, and are continuing this process to achieve an approximate fleet size of 455 aircraft in 2005. In addition, as part of ongoing negotiations with financiers, we have converted some long-term financing arrangements into operating leases of a reduced term and, in several instances, re-acquired previously rejected aircraft as circumstances warranted.
Redeployment and Reduction of Fleet. On October 6, 2004, the Company announced a plan to expand its international route network, redeploying aircraft to more profitable routes and reducing the overall size of its mainline fleet. These actions are part of the Company's ongoing strategy to adjust fleet size and route mix to current market conditions, which continue to be intensely competitive. In the first six months of 2005, we reduced our mainline operating fleet by 39 aircraft as compared to December 31, 2004.
In addition, on April 22, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved an agreement to transition to other regional carriers all flying operations currently performed for the Company by United Express carrier AWAC. This transition will be completed by early 2006. The Company does not anticipate that this change will adversely affect its United Express operations. Under this transition agreement, AWAC refunded to the Company on April 22, 2005 approximately $22 million of previously incurred costs, which was recognized as a reduction to regional carrier expense. As a result of the transition agreement, the Company also recognized a charge of $18 million for aircraft impairments relating to planned accelerated retirement of certain aircraft currently operated by AWAC.
Effective in May 2005, we amended our capacity purchase agreement with Mesa Air Group to give them the right to place into service up to 30 leased 50-seat regional jet aircraft to be branded as United Express and operated within the United Express system. United will receive $30 million in cash before the end of 2005 for agreeing to this amendment, of which $10 million was received during the second quarter of 2005; these payments will be recognized as a reduction to regional carrier expense over the contract terms.
Municipal Bond Obligations. As a result of our bankruptcy filing, we are not permitted to make payments on unsecured pre-petition debt. We have been advised that our municipal bonds may be unsecured (or in certain instances, partially secured) pre-petition debt. At June 30, 2005, we had approximately $1.7 billion outstanding in municipal bonds that were issued on behalf of United to finance the construction of improvements at airport-related facilities. For further details, see "Commitments and Contingencies" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Claims Resolution Process. As permitted under the bankruptcy process, our creditors have filed proofs of claim with the Bankruptcy Court and we expect new claims to be filed in the future. Through the claims resolution process, we have identified many claims which we believe should be disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court for a number of reasons, such as our identification of claims that are duplicative, have been amended or superseded by later filed claims, are without merit, or are otherwise overstated. We have filed omnibus objections to many of these claims and will continue to file additional objections. For further details, see "Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11 - Financial Statement Presentation" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Results of Operations
Over the past several years, the Company and the airline industry have been faced with severe business challenges and fundamental changes in the airline industry that have produced material adverse impacts on our results of operations, financial position and liquidity. During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we reported earnings from operations of $48 million and $7 million, respectively, and we reported net losses of $1,430 million and $247 million for the same respective periods. In addition, during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we reported losses from operations of $202 million and $204 million, respectively, and we reported net losses of $2,500 million and $706 million for the same respective periods.
Operating revenues for the airline industry in general, as well as for the Company, have been adversely impacted by a variety of factors in the last few years. Such factors have included from time to time unfavorable general economic conditions; the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and fears of further terrorist activities; enhanced airport security measures which have increased airport inconvenience and produced some negative customer reaction; the enactment of federal taxes on ticket sales to fund those new security measures; the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in early 2003 and subsequent fears of other outbreaks of communicable diseases; and the growth of low-cost carriers in the United States placing further downward pressures on revenues by forcing us to compete with discounted fares offered by low-cost airlines in a growing percentage of the markets we serve. These and other adverse factors caused United mainline passenger revenue per revenue passenger mile to decline from 13.3 cents in 2000 (the last year we reported an operating profit) to 10.8 cents in 2004.
In the first six months of 2005, United mainline passenger revenue was 11.03 cents per revenue passenger mile, or 0.4% lower than it was in the first six months of 2004. Passenger load factor improved from 78.7% in the first six months of 2004 to 80.8% in the same period of 2005. These results reflect a 2.5% reduction in system capacity between periods. As announced in the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company continues to shift capacity from domestic to international markets and it believes that its actions to address overcapacity domestically are beginning to produce unit revenue improvements in that segment.
Our operating expenses have fluctuated as we have sought to restructure our obligations in bankruptcy, adjust our mainline and regional carrier operating capacity to match marketplace demand, and cope with historically high jet fuel prices throughout recent years. United mainline operating cost per available seat mile increased from 10.6 cents in 2000 to 12.0 cents in 2001, and then declined to 10.2 cents by 2004. In spite of significant accomplishments in restructuring our operating expenses, including significant contributions from employees and creditors through the bankruptcy process, high fuel costs have had a significant adverse affect on unit operating costs, particularly in more recent periods. In the first six months of 2005, United mainline operating cost per available seat mile ("CASM") was 10.39 cents per available seat mile, or 3.5% higher than it was in the first six months of 2004. The increase in fuel prices between periods added approximately seven tenths of a cent to the first six months of 2005 CASM, as compared to the same period in 2004.
Summary of Results. The air travel business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Our operations can be impacted by adverse weather and our first- and fourth-quarter results normally reflect reduced travel demand. Historically, results of operations are better in the second and third quarters.
The second quarter 2005 results include $1.4 billion in reorganization items recorded in connection with our bankruptcy proceedings. The second quarter 2004 results included $144 million in reorganization items.
Second Quarter 2005
Compared with Second Quarter 2004. Operating revenues increased
$234 million. Passenger mainline revenues increased $53 million due to
a 3% increase in yield partially offset by a 1% decrease in traffic. The
following analysis by market is based on information reported to the U.S.
Department of Transportation:
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenues (in millions) |
3,301
|
2,042
|
671
|
482
|
106
|
Increase (Decrease) from 2004: | |||||
Passenger revenues (in millions) |
53
|
(128)
|
117
|
46
|
18
|
Passenger revenues (percent) |
1.6%
|
(5.9%)
|
21.2%
|
10.5%
|
21.3%
|
Available seat miles (capacity) |
(3.0%)
|
(11.6%)
|
19.5%
|
3.0%
|
20.5%
|
Passenger load factor |
1.4pt.
|
3.2pt
|
(3.8)pt
|
0.2pt
|
3.1pt
|
Revenue passenger miles (traffic) |
(1.4%)
|
(8.2%)
|
14.2%
|
3.3%
|
25.7%
|
Revenue per revenue passenger mile (yield) |
3.2%
|
2.6%
|
6.7%
|
8.3%
|
(4.5%)
|
Cargo revenues increased $13 million (8%) due to a 6% higher yield and 2% increase in cargo ton miles. Other operating revenues increased $41 million (15%) primarily due to increases in third party maintenance revenues and Mileage Plus mileage sales.
Operating expenses increased
$193 million (5%) and mainline unit cost (operating expenses, excluding
regional costs per available seat mile) increased 6%.
(In millions)
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
Salaries and related costs |
(156)
|
(12.9%)
|
(a)
|
Aircraft fuel |
262
|
37.8%
|
(b)
|
Regional affiliates |
80
|
13.2%
|
(c)
|
Purchased services |
13
|
3.5%
|
|
Landing fees and other rent |
(17)
|
(7.0%)
|
|
Aircraft maintenance |
34
|
17.6%
|
(d)
|
Depreciation and amortization |
(17)
|
(7.8%)
|
|
Cost of sales |
2
|
1.4%
|
|
Aircraft rent |
(25)
|
(18.7%)
|
(e)
|
Commissions |
(5)
|
(6.2%)
|
|
Special operating items |
18
|
100%
|
(f)
|
Other |
4
|
1.4%
|
|
Total |
193
|
4.6%
|
(a) Decreased primarily due to cost savings associated with lower salary and benefit rates and lower full-time equivalent employees.
(b) Increased primarily as a result of a 45% increase in the average cost of fuel (including tax and hedge impact) partially offset by a decrease in consumption.
(c) Increased primarily as a result of increased fuel costs and volumes of United Express regional carrier flying partially offset by new contract savings.
(d) Increased primarily due to higher levels of purchased maintenance activity. This increase is offset by productivity and labor rate improvements, the effects of which are included in (a) above.
(e) Decreased due to restructuring of aircraft lease obligations and fleet reductions.
(f) See "Special Items" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
Other non-operating expense amounted to $96 million in the second quarter of 2005, compared to $111 million in the second quarter of 2004, excluding reorganization items. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company recognized a non-operating loss of $1 million in miscellaneous, net to record the impact of non-designated and ineffective fuel hedges. Inclusive of reorganization items, other non-operating expense amounted to $1.5 billion in the second quarter of 2005, compared to $255 million in the second quarter of 2004. For details on reorganization items, see "Reorganization Items" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
First Six Months of
2005 Compared with First Six Months of 2004. Operating revenues
increased $240 million. Passenger mainline revenues declined $22 million.
In the first quarter of 2004, passenger revenues included a $60 million
favorable adjustment. The following analysis by market is based on information
reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation:
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenues (in millions) |
6,217
|
3,831
|
1,275
|
889
|
222
|
Increase (Decrease) from 2004: | |||||
Passenger revenues (in millions) |
(22)
|
(307)
|
195
|
60
|
30
|
Passenger revenues (percent) |
(0.4%)
|
(7.4%)
|
18.0%
|
7.2%
|
16.0%
|
Available seat miles (capacity) |
(2.5%)
|
(10.6%)
|
17.8%
|
3.6%
|
19.4%
|
Passenger load factor |
2.1pt.
|
4.4pt
|
(4.1)pt
|
0.1pt
|
0.5pt
|
Revenue passenger miles (traffic) |
0.1%
|
(5.4%)
|
12.1%
|
3.7%
|
20.1%
|
Revenue per revenue passenger mile (yield) |
(0.4%)
|
(2.1%)
|
5.9%
|
4.9%
|
(4.9%)
|
Cargo revenues increased $37 million (12%) largely due to a 4% higher yield and 8% increase in volumes. Other operating revenues increased $14 million (2%) primarily due to an increase in third party maintenance revenues and Mileage Plus mileage sales, partially offset by a decrease in UAFC fuel sales to third parties.
Operating expenses increased $238 million (3%) and
mainline unit cost (operating expenses, excluding regional affiliates costs
per available seat mile)
increased 3%.
(In millions)
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
Salaries and related costs |
(372)
|
(15.1%)
|
(a)
|
Aircraft fuel |
464
|
35.8%
|
(b)
|
Regional affiliates |
174
|
15.1%
|
(c)
|
Purchased services |
22
|
3.0%
|
|
Landing fees and other rent |
(15)
|
(3.2%)
|
|
Aircraft maintenance |
68
|
18.0%
|
(d)
|
Depreciation and amortization |
(34)
|
(7.6%)
|
|
Cost of sales |
(51)
|
(15.0%)
|
(e)
|
Aircraft rent |
(42)
|
(15.5%)
|
(f)
|
Commissions |
(9)
|
(5.6%)
|
|
Special operating items |
18
|
100%
|
(g)
|
Other |
15
|
2.5%
|
|
Total |
238
|
2.9%
|
(a) Decreased primarily due to cost savings associated with lower salary and benefit rates and lower full-time equivalent employees.
(b) Increased primarily as a result of a 41% increase in the average cost of fuel (including tax and hedge impact) partially offset by a decrease in consumption.
(c) Increased primarily as a result of increased fuel costs and volumes of United Express regional carrier flying, partially offset by new contract savings.
(d) Increased primarily due to higher levels of purchased maintenance activity. This increase is offset by productivity and labor rate improvements, the effects of which are included in (a) above.
(e) Decreased due to lower third-party fuel sales by UAFC.
(f) Decreased due to restructuring of aircraft lease obligations and fleet reductions.
(g) See "Special Items" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
Other non-operating expense amounted to $148 million in the first six months of 2005, compared to $213 million in the first six months of 2004, excluding special non-operating items and reorganization items. In the first six months of 2005, the Company recognized a non-operating gain of $40 million in miscellaneous, net to record the impact of non-designated and ineffective fuel hedges. Inclusive of special non-operating items and reorganization items, other non-operating expense amounted to $2.3 billion in the first six months of 2005, compared to $500 million in the first six months of 2004. For details on the special items and reorganization items, see "Reorganization Items" and "Special Items" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The matters described in "Liquidity and Capital Resources," to the extent that they relate to future events or expectations, may be significantly affected by the Chapter 11 reorganization process. Those proceedings involve, or may result in, various restrictions on the Company's activities, limitations on financing, and may require Bankruptcy Court and Creditors' Committee approval for various matters, and may create uncertainty as to ongoing relationships with vendors, suppliers, customers and others with whom we may conduct or seek to conduct business.
Generally, under the Bankruptcy Code most of a debtor's liabilities must be satisfied in full before the debtor's stockholders can receive any distribution on account of such shares. The rights and satisfaction of claims of our various creditors and security holders will be determined by the confirmed plan of reorganization. It is likely that pre-petition unsecured claims against the Company will be substantially impaired in connection with our reorganization. At this time we can make no prediction concerning how each of these claims will be valued in the bankruptcy proceedings. We believe that UAL's presently outstanding equity securities will have no value and it is expected that those securities will be canceled under any plan of reorganization that we propose.
UAL's total of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, including restricted cash, was $2.7 billion at June 30, 2005, as compared to $2.2 billion at December 31, 2004.
As of June 30, 2005, we had $968 million in restricted cash, an increase of $91 million as compared to December 31, 2004. Restricted cash primarily represents cash collateral to secure workers' compensation obligations, security deposits for airport leases and reserves with institutions that process our credit card ticket sales. Prior to 2003, we met many of these obligations (which were smaller in amount) through surety bonds or secured letters of credit; however, such facilities are currently largely unavailable to us. As a result, we may be required to post significant additional cash collateral to meet such obligations in the future.
During the second quarter of 2005, an institution that processes our credit card ticket sales increased its cash holdback by approximately $84 million to secure advanced ticket sales in accordance with the terms of its merchant agreement.
Operating Activities. For the first six months of 2005, we generated cash flow from operations of $818 million, a $380 million increase as compared to $438 million in operating cash flows generated in the first six months of 2004.
We contributed $127 million towards our pension funding obligations in 2004, but made no cash contributions in 2005. Detailed information regarding our pension plans is included in "Retirement and Postretirement Plans" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Investing Activities. Cash used from investing activities was $122 million in 2005, as compared to $278 million in 2004. The change from 2004 to 2005 primarily reflects smaller restricted cash increases in 2005 than 2004, decreased property additions (including aircraft and aircraft spare parts), and increased proceeds from the disposition of property and equipment. In the first six months of 2005, the Company sold six B727, four B737 and five B767 aircraft, transferred seven B767 aircraft to non-operating status and rejected (and/or returned to the lessor) 29 B737 aircraft and three B767 aircraft under Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Financing Activities. Cash flows used in financing activities were $178 million in 2005 and $345 million in 2004. In the first six months of 2005, we made principal payments under debt and capital lease obligations of $113 million and $55 million, respectively. The decrease in principal payments on capital lease obligations was related to aircraft rejections under Section 1110. In addition, we made $10 million in principal payments on the DIP Financing in the first six months of 2005.
The Company has committed to spend an estimated $100 million for the remainder of 2005 for the purchase of property and equipment. At June 30, 2005, commitments for the future purchase of property and equipment, principally aircraft, approximated$1.7 billion, after deducting advance payments. For further details, see "Commitments and Contingencies" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
At June 30, 2005, we had a total of $853 million in debt outstanding under the DIP Financing and $37 million in outstanding letters of credit. We believe that the DIP Financing, together with other sources of cash, such as from operations, will be adequate to provide for our projected future liquidity needs through our emergence from bankruptcy. On July 15, 2005 the Bankruptcy Court approved an agreement with the DIP financing lenders to increase the term loan to $1.1 billion, thereby providing a total facility of $1.3 billion. This agreement also provides for a new capital expenditure basket for certain aircraft purchases, including a cash sublimit, but requiring financing for the balance of the aggregate purchase price of such aircraft.
The Company is proposing to enter into an amendment to the DIP financing which would provide for, among other things, a waiver of any event of default as a result of the Company acquiring the Tranche A, Tranche B and Tranche C indebtedness under the Series 1997-1 Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates. The proposed amendment further provides for the refinancing of a majority of that indebtedness, as secured by up to 14 aircraft to be acquired in connection with the acquisition of that indebtedness. This proposed amendment will require the approval of the DIP financing lenders and the Bankruptcy Court. There can be no assurance that either approval will be received. For more information on the terms of the proposed amendment, please see the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005.
With historically high fuel prices and continuing weak revenue, we have continued to restructure our costs to achieve a business plan that will permit the Company to attract exit financing for our projected future liquidity needs upon emergence from bankruptcy. This exit financing, together with other available cash and cash flows from future operations, is expected to provide us with adequate levels of liquidity necessary for our ongoing operations and to service our restructured fixed obligations. We expect that in order for the Company to attract exit financing, we will be required to comply with financial covenants, and that this financing would be approved as part of an overall plan of reorganization. However, the Company cannot guarantee that this financing will be obtained, or that a plan of reorganization will be approved or implemented successfully.
Outlook
United expects third-quarter system mainline capacity to be down about 5 percent year-over-year. System mainline capacity for 2005 is expected to be about 3 percent lower than 2004. The Company projects fuel prices for the third quarter, including taxes and excluding the impact of hedges, to average $1.83 per gallon. The Company has 6.5 percent of its expected fuel consumption for the third quarter hedged at an average of $1.29 per gallon, including taxes. In the third quarter, the Company expects to recognize other large non-cash reorganization items as we move toward exit from bankruptcy.
Certain statements throughout
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
are forward-looking and thus reflect the Company's current expectations
and beliefs with respect to certain current and future events and financial
performance. Such forward-looking statements are and will be subject to
many risks and uncertainties relating to our operations and business environment
that may cause actual results to differ materially from any future results
expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements
include, without limitation, the following: our ability to continue as
a going concern; our ability to comply with the terms of the DIP Financing
or negotiate modifications or amendments thereto as necessary; our ability
to successfully renegotiate aircraft financings under Section 1110 of the
Bankruptcy Code; our ability to obtain court approval with respect to motions
in the Chapter 11 proceeding prosecuted by us from time to time; our ability
to develop, prosecute, confirm and consummate one or more plans of reorganization
with respect to the Chapter 11 cases; risks associated with third parties
seeking and obtaining court approval to terminate or shorten our exclusive
period to propose and confirm one or more plans of reorganization; the
potential adverse impact of the Chapter 11 cases on our liquidity or results
of operations; the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee or conversion of
the cases to Chapter 7; the costs and availability of financing; our ability
to execute our business plan; our ability to attract, motivate and/or retain
key employees; our ability to attract and retain customers; demand for
transportation in the markets in which we operate; general economic conditions;
the effects of any hostilities or act of war or any terrorist attack; the
ability of other air carriers with whom we have alliances or partnerships
to provide the services contemplated by the respective arrangements with
such carriers; the costs and availability of aircraft insurance; the costs
of aviation fuel; the costs associated with security measures and practices;
labor costs; competitive pressures on pricing (particularly from lower-cost
competitors) and on demand; government legislation and regulation; the
ability of the Company to maintain satisfactory labor relations;any disruptions
to operations due to any potential actions by our labor groups; weather
conditions; and other risks and uncertainties set forth from time to time
in UAL's reports to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Consequently, the forward-looking statements should not be regarded as
representations or warranties by the Company that such matters will be
realized. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update or revise any
of the forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information,
unforeseen events, changed circumstances or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in UAL's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2004.
Interest Rate Risk -
(In millions, except average contract rates) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest rate swap |
|
|
|
Price Risk (Aircraft Fuel) - When market conditions indicate risk reduction is achievable, the Company enters into fuel option contracts to reduce its price risk exposure to jet fuel. The option contracts are designed to provide protection against increases in the price of aircraft fuel. As market conditions change, so may the Company's hedging program.
|
|||
(In millions, except average contract rates) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Purchased call options - Heating oil |
|
|
|
Sold put options - Heating oil |
|
|
|
*Estimated fair values represent the amount the Company
would pay/receive on June 30, 2005 to terminate the contracts.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried
out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management,
including the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer
("CFO"), of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Company's
management, including the CEO and CFO, has concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures are effective. During the second quarter
of 2005, there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits.
UAL CORPORATION |
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace |
Frederic F. Brace |
Executive Vice President and |
Chief Financial Officer |
(principal financial and |
accounting officer) |
|
|
Exhibit No. | Description |
10.1 | Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2005, by and among UAL Corporation, all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (as filed as Exhibit 10.1 to UAL's Form 8-K dated April 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.2 | Eleventh Amendment and Limited Waiver, dated as of April 8, 2005, to Debtor in Possession Credit Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2002, by and among United Air Lines, Inc., the United subsidiaries named therein, the Lenders named therein and Bank One, NA, as agent |
10.3 | Letter Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2005, entered into in accordance with the Railway Labor Act by and between UAL Corp., United Air Lines, Inc., and the Air Line Pilots Association, International |
12.1 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
12.2 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements |
31.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
31.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
CONFORMED VERSION
WAIVER, CONSENT AND ELEVENTH AMENDMENT, dated as of April 8, 2005 (the "Amendment"), to the REVOLVING CREDIT, TERM LOAN AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT, dated as of December 24, 2002, among UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), a debtor and a debtor-in-possession in a case pending under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, UAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and the parent company of the Borrower (the "Parent") and all of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Borrower and the Parent signatory thereto (the "Subsidiaries" and together with the Parent, each a "Guarantor" and collectively the "Guarantors"), each of which Guarantors referred to in this paragraph is a debtor and a debtor-in-possession in a case pending under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (formerly known as JPMorgan Chase Bank), a national banking corporation ("JPMCB"), CITICORP USA, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Citi"), THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., a New York corporation ("CIT Group"), GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("GECC"), each of the other financial institutions from time to time party hereto (together with JPMCB, Citi, CIT Group and GECC, the "Lenders"), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and CITICORP USA, INC., as co-administrative agents (together, the "Agents") for the Lenders and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as paying agent (in such capacity, the "Paying Agent") for the Lenders.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Guarantors, the Lenders, the Paying Agent and the Agents are parties to that certain Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2002 (as heretofore amended, modified or supplemented, and as in effect on the date hereof, the "Credit Agreement");
WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Guarantors have requested that from and after the Effective Date (as hereinafter defined), the Lenders agree (A) to waive the Events of Default described in Article II hereof, (B) to consent to certain modifications of the Security and Pledge Agreement and the Aircraft Mortgage, in each case as more fully set forth in Article III hereof and (C) that the Credit Agreement be amended as set forth in Article IV, all subject to and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I. Definitions
1. As used herein, all terms that are defined in the
Credit Agreement shall have the same meanings herein.
ARTICLE II. Waivers
2. Waiver. The Lenders hereby waive any Events of Default that might occur or have occurred as a result of (i) the Borrower's and the Guarantors' failure to timely provide copies of the notices such entities received in connection with the PBGC's effort to involuntarily terminate the United Airlines Pilot Defined Benefits Pension Plan, as required pursuant to Section 5.01(h) of the Credit Agreement, (ii) the Borrower's failure to satisfy the condition that no Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of a continuation of a Eurodollar Loan insofar as the Events of Default described in this Article II had occurred and were continuing at the time any Eurodollar Loans may have been continued and (iii) the Borrower's and the Guarantors' failure to provide written notice required pursuant to Section 5.05 of the Credit Agreement as a result of the Events of Default described in clauses (i) and (ii) of this paragraph.
3. Consent to Amendment to Security and Pledge Agreement. The Lenders hereby consent to, and authorize the Collateral Agent to execute, an amendment to the Security and Pledge Agreement, substantially in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto.
4.
Consent to Amendment to Aircraft Mortgage. The Lenders hereby consent
to, and authorize the Collateral Agent to execute, an amendment to the
Aircraft Mortgage, substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto,
permitting the Borrower to lease Engines and Spare Engines (each as defined
in the Aircraft Mortgage) on a short-term basis (up to 120 days) to repair
customers and other third party air carriers under certain circumstances.
ARTICLE IV. Amendments
5. Amendments to Section 1.01. Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by:
(A) deleting the definition of each of the following terms: "Collateral Documents", and "Orders", appearing therein, and inserting the following new definitions in appropriate alphabetical order:
"Orders" shall mean the Interim Order and the Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court referred to in Sections 4.01(b) and 4.02(d) and the Seventh Amendment Order, the Eighth Amendment Order, the Tenth Amendment Order and the Eleventh Amendment Order.
"Mortgage Amendment No. 4" shall mean that certain Fourth Amendment to the Aircraft Mortgage dated as of April __, 2005.
"Eleventh Amendment Order" shall mean an order of the Bankruptcy Court in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Agents approving the execution of the Waiver, Consent and Eleventh Amendment dated as of April __, 2005.
7. Amendment to Section 6.01. Section 6.01 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words "and April 15, 2005," appearing in sub-clause (xx) thereof and inserting in lieu thereof the words ", April 15, 2005, July 15, 2005 and September 15, 2005,".
8. Amendment to Section 6.03. Clause (xv) of Section 6.03 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by inserting at the end thereof the words "at any one time outstanding".
9. Amendment to Section 7.01. Section 7.01 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words "and April 15, 2005" appearing in sub-clause (r) thereof and inserting in lieu thereof the words ", April 15, 2005, July 15, 2005 and September 15, 2005".
(A) Execution. This Amendment shall have been executed by the Borrower, the Guarantors and the Required Lenders and each Agent shall have received evidence reasonably satisfactory to it of such execution.
(B) Bankruptcy Court Order; Payment of Fees. (i) The Bankruptcy Court shall have entered an order reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the Agents (x) approving the terms of this Amendment to the extent required by the Bankruptcy Code and (y) authorizing the payment by the Borrower of the fees referred to in that certain Eleventh Amendment Fee Letter dated the date hereof and (ii) such amendment and other fees shall have been paid in cash to the Paying Agent within one Business Day after entry of the order referred to above.
(C) Opinions of Counsel. The Agents and the Collateral Agent shall have received a favorable written opinion of McAfee & Taft, special counsel to the Agents, dated the Amendment Effective Date, with respect to the Liens of the Aircraft Mortgage, and reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the Collateral Agent.
(D) Corporate and Judicial Proceedings. All corporate and judicial proceedings and all instruments and agreements in connection with the transactions among the Borrower, the Guarantors, the Agents and the Lenders contemplated by this Amendment shall be reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the Lenders, and the Agents and the Lenders shall have received all information and copies of all documents and papers, including records of corporate and judicial proceedings, which the Agents may have reasonably requested in connection herewith, such documents and papers where appropriate to be certified by proper corporate, governmental or judicial authorities.
(E) Mortgage Amendment. The Borrower shall have duly executed and delivered to the Collateral Agent a Fourth Amendment to the Aircraft Mortgage, in substantially the form of Exhibit B, and the Collateral Agent shall have received evidence that such mortgage amendment has been recorded with the FAA.
11. Ratification. Except to the extent hereby amended, the Credit Agreement and each of the Loan Documents remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and affirmed.
12. Costs and Expenses. The Borrower agrees that its obligations set forth in Section 10.05 of the Credit Agreement shall extend to the preparation, execution and delivery of this Amendment, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of special counsel to the Agents.
13. Representations and Warranties. The Borrower represents and warrants to the Lenders, to induce the Lenders to enter into this Amendment, that no Event of Default or event with the passage of time would constitute an Event of Default (other than the Events of Default described in Article II herein) exists on the date hereof and that each of the representations and warranties made by the Borrower in the Credit Agreement and each other Loan Document are true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof except where such representation or warranty relates to a specific date, in which such representation or warranty shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date.
14. References. This Amendment shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed (a) to be a consent granted pursuant to, or a waiver or modification of, any other term or condition of the Credit Agreement or any of the instruments or agreements referred to therein or (b) to prejudice any right or rights which the Agents or the Lenders may now have or have in the future under or in connection with the Credit Agreement or any of the instruments or agreements referred to therein. Whenever the Credit Agreement is referred to in the Credit Agreement or any of the instruments, agreements or other documents or papers executed or delivered in connection therewith, such reference shall be deemed to mean the Credit Agreement as modified by this Amendment.
15. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. A fax copy of a counterpart signature page shall serve as the functional equivalent of a manually executed copy for all purposes.
16. Applicable Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.
[SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW]
BORROWER: |
UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
GUARANTORS: |
UAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UAL LOYALTY SERVICES, LLC
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
UAL COMPANY SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
CONFETTI, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
MILEAGE PLUS HOLDINGS, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
MILEAGE PLUS MARKETING, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
MYPOINTS.COM, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
CYBERGOLD, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
ITARGET.COM, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
MYPOINTS OFFLINE SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
UAL BENEFITS MANAGEMENT, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UNITED BIZ JET HOLDINGS, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
BIZJET CHARTER, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
BIZJET FRACTIONAL, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
BIZJET SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Steven M. Rasher
|
KION LEASING, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
PREMIER MEETING AND TRAVEL SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UNITED AVIATION FUELS CORPORATION
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UNITED COGEN, INC.
By: /s/ Paul Lovejoy
|
MILEAGE PLUS, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UNITED GHS, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UNITED WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
UNITED VACATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
FOUR STAR LEASING, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
AIR WIS SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
AIR WISCONSIN, INC.
By: /s/ Frederic F. Brace
|
DOMICILE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Paul Lovejoy
|
LENDERS: |
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
By: /s/ Matthew H. Massie
|
CITICORP USA, INC.
By: /s/ James J. McCarthy
|
CIT/BUSINESS CREDIT INC.
By: /s/ Vincent Belcastro
|
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORAION
By: /s/ Roger P. Tauchman
|
ARES VI CLO LTD.
By: ARES CLO Management VI, L.P.,
By: ARES CLO GP VI, LLC,
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
ARES VII CLO LTD.
By: ARES CLO Management VII, L.P.,
By: ARES CLO GP VII, LLC,
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
ARES VIII CLO LTD.
By: ARES CLO Management VIII, L.P.,
By: ARES CLO GP VIII, LLC,
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
ARES IX CLO LTD.
By: ARES CLO Management IX, L.P.,
By: ARES CLO GP IX, LLC,
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY, LTD.
By: ARES Enhanced Loan Management, L.P.,
By: ARES Enhanced Loan GP, LLC,
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND II, L.P.
By: ARES Management II, L.P.,
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
ARES TOTAL VALUE FUND, L.P.
By: ARES Total Value Management LLC
By: /s/ David A. Sachs
|
AVL LOAN FUNDING LLC
By: AVL Loan Funding LLC for itself or as agent for AVL2 Loan Funding LLC By: /s/ Dominic Blea
|
AZURE FUNDING
By: /s/ Henry J. Sandlass
|
BUSHNELL CBNA LOAN FUNDING LLC
By: Bushnell CBNA Loan Funding LLC, for itself or as agent for Bushnell CFPI Loan Funding LLC By: /s/ Janet Haack
|
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
By: /s/ John O'Dowd
By: /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
|
CASPIAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
By: Mariner Investment Group By: /s/ Charles R. Howe II
|
CITIBANK, N.A.
By: /s/ Shawn Hendrickson
|
COSTANTINUS EATON VANCE CDO V, LTD.
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
DUNES FUNDING LLC By: /s/ Meredith J. Koslick
|
EATON VANCE CDO III, LTD.
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE CDO VI, LTD.
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE FLOATING-RATE INCOME TRUST
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE INSTITUTIONAL SENIOR LOAN FUND By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE LIMITED DURATION INCOME FUND
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE SENIOR FLOATING-RATE TRUST
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE SENIOR INCOME TRUST
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
EATON VANCE SHORT DURATION DIVERSIFIED INCOME FUND
By: Eaton Vance Management
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
FIRST TRUST/FOUR CORNERS SENIOR FLOATING RATE INCOME
FUND II,
as Lender By: Four Corners Capital Management LLC,
By: /s/ Vijay Srinivasan
|
FORTRESS PORTFOLIO TRUST, as Lender
By: Four Corners Capital Management LLC,
By: /s/ Vijay Srinivasan
|
GRAYSON & CO.
By: Boston Management and Research
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
HARCH CLO II LIMITED By: /s/ Michael E. Lewitt
|
INDOSUEZ CAPITAL FUNDING III, LIMITED
By: /s/ Alexander B. Kenna
|
INDOSUEZ CAPITAL FUNDING VI, LTD.
By: Lyon Capital Management LLC
By: /s/ Alexander B. Kenna
|
LAUREL RIDGE CAPITAL LP
By: /s/ Van Nguyen
|
LIGHTPOINT CLO 2004-1 & PREMIUM LOAN TRUST I, LTD.
PREMIUM LOAN TRUST I, LTD. By: /s/ Thomas A. Kramer
|
MARINER LDC By: Mariner Invesment Group By: /s/ Charles R. Howe II
|
MARINER OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P.
By: Mariner Investment Group By: /s/ Charles R. Howe II
|
MUIRFIELD TRADING LLC
By: /s/ Meredith J. Koslick
|
OLYMPIC CLO I LTD
By: /s/ Kevin J. Hickam
|
ORIX FINANCE CORP. I
By: /s/ Christopher L. Smith
|
SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Lender By: Four Corners Capital Management LLC,
By: /s/ Vijay Srinivasan
|
SENIOR DEBT PORTFOLIO
By: Boston Management and Research
By: /s/ Michael B. Botthof
|
SPECTRUM INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LP
By: Spectrum Group Management LLC
By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Schaffer
|
STANWICH LOAN FUNDING LLC
By: /s/ Meredith J. Koslick
|
STONEHILL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS,
L.P. By: /s/ Christopher Wilson
|
STEDMAN CBNA LOAN FUNDING LLC
By: Stedman CBNA Loan Funding LLC, for itself or as agent for Stedman CFPI Loan Funding LLC By: /s/ Janet Haack
TORONTO DOMINION (NEW YORK), LLC By: /s/ Masood Fikree
|
TRS FORE LLC
By: /s/ Alice L. Wagner
|
TRS STARK LLC
By: /s/ Alice L. Wagner
|
TRUMBULL THC2 LOAN FUNDING LLC,
By: Trumbull THC2 Loan Funding LLC, for itself or as agent for Trumbull THC2 CFPI Loan Funding LLC By: /s/ Janet Haack
|
U.A.L. INVESTORS, L.L.C.
By: Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C.,
By: /s/ Derek Schier
|
UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
By: /s/ Wilfred V. Saint
By: /s/ Richard L. Tavrow
|
WATERSHED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL
PARTNERS, L.P. By: WS Partners, L.L.C.,
By: /s/ Meridee Moore
|
WATERSHED CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
By: WS Partners, L.L.C.,
By: /s/ Meridee Moore
|
WATERSHED CAPITAL PARTNERS
(OFFSHORE), LTD. By: Watershed Asset Management L.L.C.,
By: /s/ Meridee Moore
|
WIND RIVER CLO I LTD.
By: McDonnell Investment Management, LLC,
By: /s/ Kathleen A. Zarn
|
FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT
FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of April 8, 2005 (the "Amendment"), to the SECURITY AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of December 24, 2002, made by UNITED AIR LINES, INC. ("United"), a Delaware corporation, UAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Parent"), all of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of United and the Parent (together with United and the Parent, each a "Grantor" and collectively the "Grantors, each such Grantor being a debtor and a debtor-in-possession in a case pending under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code), to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK and CITICORP USA, INC., acting as co-collateral agents (together, the "Collateral Agent").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Grantors entered into a Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2002 (as heretofore amended, modified, restated, extended or otherwise supplemented, and as in effect on the date hereof, the "Credit Agreement") among the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Collateral Agent and the Lenders from time to time party thereto; and
WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Agreement are used herein as defined therein; and
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that various amendments to the Credit Agreement be effected pursuant to a Waiver, Consent and Eleventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of the date hereof (the "Eleventh Amendment"), and the Grantors have requested that certain amendments be made to the Agreement pursuant to this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
17. Amendments to Subsection 4(b). Subsection 4(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by inserting at the end of the first sentence appearing therein the words ", other than to the extent that the legal name of any such Grantor shall have changed in accordance with a corporate restructuring or other transaction which is (A) not prohibited by Article VI of the Credit Agreement and (B) carried out in accordance with the requirements appearing in Section 5(e) of this Agreement."
18.
Amendment to Subsection 4(e). Subsection 4(e) of the Agreement is
hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
21. Except to the extent hereby amended, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed.
22. The Borrower and each Guarantor agrees that its obligations set forth in Section 10.05 of the Credit Agreement shall extend to the preparation, execution and delivery of this Amendment, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of special counsel to the Agents under the Credit Agreement.
23. This Amendment shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed (a) to be a consent granted pursuant to, or a waiver or modification of, any other term or condition of the Agreement or any other Loan Document, (b) to prejudice any right or rights which the Collateral Agents or the Lenders may now have or have in the future under or in connection with the Agreement, the Credit Agreement, any Loan Document or any of the instruments or agreements referred to therein. Whenever the Agreement is referred to in the Agreement, any Loan Document or any of the instruments, agreements or other documents or papers executed or delivered in connection therewith, such reference shall be deemed to mean the Agreement as modified by this Amendment.
24. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
25. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.
[SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW]
[signatures omitted in conformed version of Eleventh Amendment]
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AIRCRAFT, spare engineS
AND SPARE PARTS
MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was filed for recordation with the Federal Aviation Administration along with the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 1 ("Mortgage Supplement No. 1") on December 24, 2002, and the Mortgage and Mortgage Supplement No. 1 were recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on February 26, 2003 as Conveyance No. MM024558;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 2, dated March 19, 2003, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on March 26, 2003 and assigned Conveyance No. YY036809;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 3, dated July 11, 2003, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on August 1, 2003, as Conveyance No. H109394;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 4, dated March 12, 2004, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on April 23, 2004 and assigned Conveyance No. U083669;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 5, dated August 25, 2004, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on October 29, 2004 and assigned Conveyance No. FF003509;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 6, dated October 13, 2004, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on November 18, 2004 and assigned Conveyance No. ZZ030843;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 7, dated October 29, 2004, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on November 18, 2004 and assigned Conveyance No. GG033321;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 8, dated November 10, 2004, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on December 16, 2004 and assigned Conveyance No. H112344;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 9, dated November 30, 2004, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on December 16, 2004 and assigned Conveyance No. R065812;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously supplemented by the Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement Supplement No. 10, dated February 22, 2005, executed by Grantor, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on March 24, 2005 and assigned Conveyance No. M006119;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously amended by the First Amendment to Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of May 7, 2004 (the "First Mortgage Amendment"), executed by Grantor and the Collateral Agent, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on June 28, 2004 as Conveyance No. XX026858;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously amended by the Second Amendment to Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of September 1, 2004 (the "Second Mortgage Amendment"), executed by Grantor and the Collateral Agent, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on October 20, 2004 as Conveyance No. FF003475;
WHEREAS, the Mortgage was previously amended by the Third Amendment to Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of February 22, 2005 (the "Third Mortgage Amendment"), executed by Grantor and the Collateral Agent, recorded by the Federal Aviation Administration on March 24, 2005 as Conveyance No. M006120;
WHEREAS, a listing of the Airframes, Engines, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Locations currently subject to the Mortgage is attached as Exhibit 1 to this Mortgage Amendment;
WHEREAS, the parties to the Credit Agreement have entered into certain amendments to the Credit Agreement;
WHEREAS, (a) a copy of the Credit Agreement as in effect on December 24, 2002 was attached to the Mortgage as Exhibit C, (b) an unexecuted composite conformed copy of the Credit Agreement reflecting modifications made to the Credit Agreement through and including the Seventh Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of May 7, 2004 was added as Exhibit D to the Mortgage pursuant to the First Mortgage Amendment, (c) Exhibit D to the Mortgage was replaced with an updated unexecuted composite conformed copy of the Credit Agreement reflecting modifications made to the Credit Agreement through and including the Waiver, Consent and Eighth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of July 22, 2004 pursuant to the Second Mortgage Amendment, and (d) Exhibit D to the Mortgage was further replaced with an updated unexecuted composite conformed copy of the Credit Agreement reflecting modifications made to the Credit Agreement through and including the Waiver, Consent and Tenth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of February 22, 2004 pursuant to the Third Mortgage Amendment;
WHEREAS, the parties to the Credit Agreement have entered into that certain Waiver, Consent and Eleventh Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of April 8, 2005 (the "Eleventh Amendment"); and
WHEREAS, in connection with the execution of the Eleventh Amendment, the Grantor and the Collateral Agent have agreed that the Mortgage shall be amended as set forth herein subject to and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
26. Amendment to Witnesseth Section. The fourth paragraph appearing in the Witnesseth section of the Mortgage is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2002 (as previously amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified by that certain Waiver and Amendment Letter dated as of February 7, 2003, that certain First Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of February 10, 2003, that certain Second Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of February 10, 2003, that certain Correction Letter dated as of February 14, 2003, that certain Third Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of February 18, 2003, that certain Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of March 27, 2003, that certain Waiver and Fifth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of May 15, 2003, that certain Waiver and Sixth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of October 10, 2003, that the Seventh Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of May 7, 2004, that certain Waiver and Eighth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of July 21, 2004, that certain Waiver, Consent and Ninth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004, that certain Waiver, Consent and Tenth Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of January 26, 2005, and that certain Waiver, Consent and Eleventh Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement dated as of April 8, 2005 (the "Eleventh Amendment"), and as may be further amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"; a copy of the Credit Agreement as executed on December 24, 2002 is attached hereto as Exhibit C; an unexecuted conformed copy of the Credit Agreement as amended through and including the Eleventh Amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit D), among the Grantor, UAL Corporation, the parent company of the Grantor (the "Parent"), each of the direct and indirect Subsidiaries of the Grantor from time to time party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly known as JPMorgan Chase Bank), Citicorp USA, Inc. and the other lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, the "Lenders"), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (formerly known as JPMorgan Chase Bank) as Paying Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly known as JPMorgan Chase Bank) and Citicorp USA, Inc. (each, as a Co-Administrative Agent and Co-Collateral Agent), the Lenders have agreed to make the Loans to and issue Letters of Credit on behalf of the Grantor;
27. Amendments to Section 2.01. Section 2.01(b) of the Mortgage is hereby amended by (A) deleting the word "or" appearing at the end of sub-section (vi) appearing therein; (B) deleting the period appearing at the end of sub-section (vii) appearing therein and inserting the word "or" at the end of such sub-section; and (C) inserting the following new sub-section (viii) immediately following sub-section (vii):
29. Conditions to Amendment Effectiveness. The amendments set forth in this Mortgage Amendment shall not become effective until the date and time at which this Mortgage Amendment is filed for recordation with the Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Registry.
30. Costs and Expenses. The Grantor agrees that its obligations set forth in Section 10.05 of the Credit Agreement shall extend to the preparation, execution and delivery of this Mortgage Amendment, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of special counsel to the Agents (as defined in the Credit Agreement).
31. Representations and Warranties. The Grantor represents and warrants to the Collateral Agent, to induce the Collateral Agent to enter into this Mortgage Amendment, that each of the representations, warranties and covenants made by the Grantor in the Mortgage are true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof except where such representation or warranty relates to a specific date, in which such representation or warranty shall be true and correct as of such date.
32. References. This Mortgage Amendment shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed (a) to be a consent granted pursuant to, or a waiver or modification of, any other term or condition of the Mortgage or any of the instruments or agreements referred to therein or (b) to prejudice any right or rights which the Collateral Agent may now have or have in the future under or in connection with the Mortgage or any of the instruments or agreements referred to therein. Whenever the Mortgage is referred to in the Mortgage, the Credit Agreement or any of the instruments, agreements or other documents or papers executed or delivered in connection therewith, such reference shall be deemed to mean the Mortgage as modified by this Mortgage Amendment.
33. Counterparts. This Mortgage Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
34. Applicable Law. This Mortgage Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York to the full extent provided in Section 6.05 of the Mortgage.
35. This Mortgage Amendment shall be construed as supplemental
to the Mortgage and shall form a part thereof, and the Mortgage is hereby
incorporated by reference herein and is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed.
[SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor and the Collateral Agent have caused this Fourth Amendment to Aircraft, Spare Engines and Spare Parts Mortgage and Security Agreement to be duly executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
By: ______________________________
Name:
Title:
[omitted in conformed version of Eleventh Amendment]
EXHIBIT D
TO
AIRCRAFT, SPARE ENGINES AND SPARE PARTS
MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
COMPOSITE CONFORMED CREDIT AGREEMENT
(THROUGH ELEVENTH AMENDMENT)
[omitted in conformed version of Eleventh Amendment]
Letter 05-01
(Bankruptcy Exit Agreement)
THIS LETTER OF AGREEMENT, dated as of January 1, 2005, is made and entered into in accordance with the Railway Labor Act by and between UAL Corp. (hereinafter referred to as "UAL"), UNITED AIR LINES, INC. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") and the AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL (hereinafter referred to as "ALPA" or the "Association").
WHEREAS UAL, the Company and the Association have reached agreement concerning the revisions to their current collective bargaining agreement (the "2003 Pilot Agreement" and, as revised by this Letter of Agreement, the "Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement") necessary for the Company to emerge from Chapter 11; and
WHEREAS certain of the revisions shall become effective as of January 1, 2005 (the "Effective Date"), assuming the complete satisfaction of the conditions described in paragraph 15 below prior to January 31, 2005 and others shall become effective on the effective date (the "Exit Date") of a plan of reorganization proposed by UAL (the "Plan of Reorganization"); and
WHEREAS the Company has represented to the Association that the Company has concluded that UAL cannot attract the exit financing necessary to emerge from Chapter 11 absent the termination of all of the Company's defined benefit plans;
THEREFORE the parties to this Letter of Agreement hereby agree as follows:
1. Contract Extension. The amendable date of the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement shall be December 31, 2009. Section 22.D of the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement shall read in its entirety as follows:
3. Other Contract Changes. Certain other provisions of the 2003 Pilot Agreement shall be revised on the Effective Date as described on Exhibits B-1, B-2 and B-3 to this Letter of Agreement.
4. Defined Benefit Pension Plan.
a. In the event the Company seeks judicial approval to
terminate the United Airlines Pilot DefinedBenefit
Pension Plan (the "A Plan") under 29 U.S.C §1341(c) following April
11, 2005, then, on and after May 11,
2005, (i) the Association shall waive any claim it may have that the termination
of the A Plan would violate the
terms and conditions of the existing collective bargaining agreement between
the Company and the Association,
and (ii) the Association shall not otherwise oppose the Company's efforts
to terminate the A Plan under 29 U.S.C
§1341(c); provided, however, that nothing in this Letter of Agreement
shall be construed, deemed or
characterized by UAL or the Company as any agreement of any form by the
Association that the A Plan should
be terminated;
b. The Company: (i) shall not terminate or agree to terminate
the A Plan effective at any time prior to the
earlier of (A) ten (10 ) days before the Exit Date and (B) the last date
that any of the Company's other defined
benefit pension plans are terminated (the "Pension Termination Date") and
(ii) shall oppose any effort by any other
person or entity to terminate the A Plan effective at any time prior to
the Pension Termination Date;
c. The A Plan shall remain in full force and effect unless
(i) the bankruptcy court issues an order declaring
that the Company has met the requirements for plan termination under 29
U.S.C. §1341(c)(2)(B)(ii), and (ii) any
of the following has occurred: (A) no timely notice of appeal of the order
has been filed, (B) the order has been
affirmed following the exhaustion of all appeals, or (C) the Exit Date
has occurred and the Plan of Reorganization
has become effective without provision for the continuation of any such
appeals; and
d. Notwithstanding any termination of A Plan retirement
benefits, any and all of the Company's
indemnification obligations under or applicable to the A Plan shall remain
in full force and effect without regard to
Section 22 of the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement.
5. Pension Contributions. In the event that the A Plan is terminated pursuant to 29 U.S.C §1341 or §1342 following judicial approval of such termination:
a. The Company shall make an additional monthly contribution
(the "C Plan Contribution") to the United
Airlines Pilot Directed Account Plan (the "PDAP") of six percent (6%) of
pilot compensation (as measured under
the PDAP) beginning with the earlier of (i) June 1, 2005 or (ii) the first
day of the calendar month following the
Exit Date (with a pro rated C Plan Contribution for the period between
the Exit Date and the first of the month
following the Exit Date); provided, however, that in the event the Exit
Date follows June 1, 2005, C Plan
Contributions will accrue from June 1, 2005 through the Exit Date and be
contributed in a single lump sum
payment to the PDAP on the Exit Date;
b. Prior to the Exit Date, the Company and the Association
shall adopt a mutually-acceptable qualified or
non-qualified plan arrangement to accept contributions that cannot be allocated
to pilot defined contribution
accounts under Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code;
c. At any time prior to January 1, 2007, the Association
may elect, on an irrevocable basis, to amend the
Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement, effective January 1, 2008, (i) to increase
the C Plan Contribution from six percent
(6%) to seven percent (7%) of pilot compensation (as measured under the
PDAP) and (ii) to reduce the Hourly
Pay Rates under Section 3-B of the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement by one
percent (1%);
d. The C Plan Contribution shall be in addition to the
nine percent (9%) of pilot compensation contributed
to the PDAP under the 2003 Pilot Agreement; and
e. Following the Exit Date, the Company shall not establish
or re-establish any single-employer defined
benefit plan for any UAL or Company employee group unless the pilot group
is provided the option of electing to
receive a comparable defined benefit plan in lieu of the C Plan Contribution.
6. Profit Sharing. The Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement shall provide for the pilot group to participate in the revised profit sharing program described in Exhibit C to this Letter of Agreement.
7. Convertible Notes. In the event that the A Plan is terminated pursuant to 29 U.S.C §1341 or §1342 following judicial approval of such termination, the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement and the Plan of Reorganization shall provide for the issuance of $550 million of UAL convertible notes, as described in Exhibit D to this Letter of Agreement, to a trust or other entity designated by the Association. The terms of the UAL convertible notes described in Exhibit D shall be subject to mutually-acceptable modifications to optimize implementation for all parties from an accounting, securities law and tax law perspective.
8. Distribution Agreement. The Plan of Reorganization shall provide the pilot group with a distribution of UAL equity securities as provided in the amended distribution agreement described in Exhibit E to this Letter of Agreement.
9. Additional Non-Labor Savings. Prior to the Exit Date, the Association and the Company shall develop, and the Company shall begin pursuit of, a mutually-acceptable business improvement program reasonably projected to produce at least $150 million of annual savings in non-labor costs in addition to the savings contained in the Gershwin 5F business plan dated as of November 4, 2004 (the "Business Plan").
10. Administrative Claim. The Association shall accrue and be entitled to a stipulated, approved and allowed claim of administration under 11 U.S.C §503(b) in the amount of the actual cash savings provided to the Company under this Letter of Agreement from the Effective Date through the earlier of (i) the termination of this Letter of Agreement under paragraph 16 below or (ii) the Exit Date (the "Administrative Claim"). The Administrative Claim shall be extinguished upon the Exit Date unless the Association has terminated the Letter of Agreement under paragraph 16 below.
11. Indemnity. UAL and the Company shall provide indemnification on the Effective Date as described in Exhibit F to this Letter of Agreement.
12. Plan Release and Exculpation. The Plan of Reorganization shall include a plan exculpation and release provision (which provision shall be at least as comprehensive as the plan exculpation and release provision under the Plan of Reorganization for the debtor or any other person) for the Air Line Pilots Association, International, the United Master Executive Council of the Air Line Pilots Association, International, and each of their current or former (a) members, (b) officers, (c) committee members, (d) employees, (e) advisors, (f) attorneys, (g) accountants, (h) investment bankers, (i) consultants, (j) agents and (k) other representatives with respect to any liability such person or entity may have in connection with or related to the UAL bankruptcy cases, the formulation, preparation, negotiation, dissemination, implementation, administration, confirmation or consummation of any of the Plan of Reorganization, the disclosure statement concerning the Plan of Reorganization, the 2003 Pilot Agreement, this Letter of Agreement, the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement or any contract, employee benefit plan, instrument, release or other agreement or document created, modified, amended or entered into in connection with either the Plan of Reorganization or any agreement between the Company, UAL and the Association, or any other act taken or omitted to be taken in connection with the United bankruptcy.
13. Assumption of the Pilot Agreement. The Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement (other than with respect to the A Plan if the A Plan is terminated) shall be assumed under 11 U.S.C. §365 under the Plan of Reorganization.
14. Bankruptcy Actions. The Company and the Association shall take the following actions to seek the approval of this Letter of Agreement by the bankruptcy court in In Re UAL Corporation et al., Case No. 02-B-48191 (Bankr. N.D. Ill.) (the "Bankruptcy Cases"):
a. the Company shall file a motion for approval of the
Letter of Agreement under 11 U.S.C. §363, in form
and substance reasonably acceptable to the Association, by no later than
January 21, 2005;
b. the Company shall provide, to the extent reasonably
practicable, the Association's counsel with copies
of, and a reasonable opportunity to comment on, all motions, applications,
proposed orders, pleadings and
supporting papers prepared by the Company for filing with the bankruptcy
court relating to court approval of this
Letter of Agreement; and
c. both the Company and the Association shall support
and seek the approval of this Letter of Agreement
in the Bankruptcy Cases without condition, qualification or exception;
shall use their best efforts to obtain the
support of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and other parties
and stakeholders for the Letter of
Agreement; and shall take every reasonable action necessary to obtain judicial
approval of this Letter of
Agreement in the Bankruptcy Cases without condition, qualification or exception,
including the filing of motions,
objections and appeals.
15. Conditions to Effectiveness. This Letter of Agreement shall become effective as of January 1, 2005, subject to the occurrence of all of the following prior to January 31, 2005: (a) acceptance by the United Master Executive Council of the Association, (b) United pilot membership ratification under the Association's Constitution and By-Laws, (c) if required, approval by the Company's Board of Directors, (d) execution by the President of the Association, and (e) withdrawal of the Company's motion to reject the 2003 Pilot Agreement under 11 U.S.C. §1113.
16. Termination Rights. This Letter of Agreement may be terminated by the Association, by written notice from the Association to the Company (the "Termination Notice"), given before or after the Effective Date but no later than the Exit Date, but in no event later than sixty (60) days following the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. failure of the court to issue final judicial approval
of this Letter of Agreement, without condition,
qualification or exception, by January 31, 2005;
b. a court of competent jurisdiction enters a final,
non-appealable judicial order that the Company is not
entitled to the termination of the A Plan under 29 U.S.C §1341(c);
c. failure of the Company to implement, through binding
agreement or final judicial order effective no later
than June 1, 2005, revisions to (i) the labor contracts of the Company's
other unionized employees and (ii) the
wages, benefits and working conditions of the Company's salaried and management
employees so that the
aggregate revisions in (i) and (ii) are reasonably projected to produce
at least $1.0 billion in average annual cas
savings in labor and pension costs for the Company from January 1, 2005
through and including January 1, 2010,
unless such action is cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Association
within twenty (20) days of the
Termination Notice;
d. the filing by UAL or United of, support by UAL or
United for, or judicial confirmation or approval of
(as the case may be), a plan of reorganization or a proposed disclosure
statement which (i) contains any material
term that is materially inconsistent with the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement
or this Letter of Agreement or (ii)
proposes or confirms a capital structure or ownership structure that is
not reasonably acceptable to the
Association unless, in either case (i) or (ii), such action is cured to
the reasonable satisfaction of the Association
within twenty (20) days of the Termination Notice; or
e. any other material breach of the Company's or UAL's
obligations under this Letter of Agreement unless
such breach is cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Association
within twenty (20) days of the Termination
Notice.
In the event of such termination, (A) the Administrative Claim shall be paid on the Exit Date, (B) this Letter of Agreement shall otherwise become null and void in its entirety, and (C) the parties shall thereafter be governed by the 2003 Pilot Agreement (including the A Plan) and without regard to this Letter of Agreement.
17. Fees and Expenses. The Company shall reimburse the Association for fees and expenses incurred in connection with this Letter of Agreement as described on Exhibit G to this Letter of Agreement.
18. Agreement. This Letter of Agreement is a final, binding and conclusive commitment and agreement between UAL, the Company and the Association. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Letter of Agreement, judicial approval of this Letter of Agreement shall constitute approval and allowance of the Administrative Claim and shall otherwise have the same meaning and effect as the judicial approval of the 2003 Pilot Agreement in the Bankruptcy Cases signed on April 30, 2003.
19. Amendments; Waiver. This Letter of Agreement may be amended, modified, superseded or canceled and any of its provisions may be waived only by a written instrument executed by all parties or, in the case of a waiver, by the party waiving compliance. Except as otherwise expressly provided in paragraph 16 above with respect to the delivery of a notice of termination, the failure of any party at any time to require performance of any provision of this Letter of Agreement shall not affect the right of that party at a later time to enforce the same or a different provision. No waiver by any party of a right under this Letter of Agreement shall be deemed or construed as a further or continuing waiver of any such right with respect to the same or a different provision of this Letter of Agreement.
20. Notices. Any notice or other communication given under to the terms of this Letter of Agreement must be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the day it is delivered by hand, on the day it is sent by facsimile with confirmation of receipt by the transmitting machine, on the business day after it is sent by a national overnight mail service (delivery charge prepaid), or on the third business day after it is mailed first class, postage prepaid, in any case to the following addresses:
If to the Company: | United Airlines, Inc.
1200 East Algonquin Road Elk Grove Township, Illinois 60007 Attention: Paul Lovejoy Facsimile: 847-700-4099 |
with copies to: | Kirkland & Ellis
200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Attention: James H.M. Sprayregen Facsimile: 312-861-2200 |
If to the Association: | United Master Executive Council
Air Line Pilots Association, International 9550 West Higgins Road, Suite 1000 Rosemont, IL 60018 Attention: Master Chairman Facsimile: 847-292-1777 |
with copies to: | Cohen, Weiss and Simon, LLP
330 West 42nd Street 25th Floor New York, New York 10036 Attention: Babette Ceccotti Facsimile: 212-695-5436 |
or to such other address or to such other person as any party shall have last designated by written notice provided to the other parties in the manner set forth in this paragraph.
22. Headings; Construction. The paragraph headings in this Letter of Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and do not restrict or otherwise modify any of the terms or provisions of this Letter of Agreement. Unless otherwise expressly provided, the words "including" or "includes" in this Letter of Agreement do not limit the preceding words or terms and shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without limitation."
23. Exhibits. This Letter of Agreement includes all of Exhibits A through G hereto. Except as otherwise expressly set forth therein, all capitalized terms in Exhibits A through G shall have the meanings defined in this Letter of Agreement.
24.
Fair and Equitable Pension Treatment. In the event the Company
implements, or reaches agreement with respect to, a legislative or other
pension funding solution that permits the continuation or maintenance of
any of the Company's defined benefit plans following the Pension Termination
Date, the pilots will receive the full benefit of that legislative or other
solution to maintain the pilot A Plan in the same status (e.g., frozen
or active) as any other surviving plan so long as the pilot labor and pension
savings contributed to the restructuring remain fair and proportional to
other employee groups' labor and pension savings contributed to the restructuring
in the manner contemplated under the Business Plan in light of any such
legislative or other pension funding solution.
(Signature page to follow)
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Letter of Agreement this
__ day of January, 2005.
WITNESS:
|
FOR UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
Peter B. Kain
FOR UAL CORPORATION
Glenn F. Tilton
|
WITNESS:
|
FOR THE AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
Duane E. Woerth, President
Mark Bathurst, Chairman
|
Exhibit A
Revised Pay Rates
Section 3-B "Hourly Rates" is modified to read as follows:
3-B-1 Effective January 1, 2005 the hourly rates for Captains and First
Officers shall be as follows. The hourly rates, overrides, and incentive
pay established in this Section 3 shall govern all aspects of pilot compensation.
3-B-1-a Hourly Rates
Captains
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
First Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3-B-1-b deleted
3-B-2 Effective May 1, 2006 the hourly rates for Captains and First Officers shall be as follows:
3-B-2-a Hourly Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
First Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3-B-2-b deleted
3-B-3 Effective May 1, 2007 the hourly rates for Captains and First Officers shall be as follows:
3-B-3-a Hourly Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
First Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3-B-4 Effective January 1, 2008 the hourly rates for Captains and First Officers shall be as follows:
3-B-4-a Hourly Rates
Captains
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
First Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3-B-5 Effective May 1, 2008 the hourly rates for Captains and First Officers shall be as follows:
3-B-5-a Hourly Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
First Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3-B-6 Effective May 1, 2009 the hourly rates for Captains and First Officers shall be as follows:
3-B-6-a Hourly Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
First Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
1yr |
|
|
|
|
|
2yr |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr |
|
|
|
|
|
4yr |
|
|
|
|
|
5yr |
|
|
|
|
|
6yr |
|
|
|
|
|
7yr |
|
|
|
|
|
8yr |
|
|
|
|
|
9yr |
|
|
|
|
|
10yr |
|
|
|
|
|
11yr |
|
|
|
|
|
12yr |
|
|
|
|
|
Renumber balance of Section 3-B
Exhibit B-1
Other Contract Revisions
1. Section 3-B-10-a "Late Night Flying" deleted
2. Section 5-G-1-e-(1)-(d) deleted
3. Section 5-G-1-e-(2) modified to read as follows:
5-G-1-e-(2) A pilot functioning as a reserve will not be scheduled into a day(s) off.
4. Section 20-J-4-d deleted
5. Section 22-A-2 add this LOA
6. Letter Of Agreement 04-09 "PBS Contract Modifications" change to 20-E-2-b is modified to read as follows:
Exhibit B-2
Other Contract Revisions
If this letter accurately reflects our agreement, please sign and
return three (3) copies for our files.
_________________________________
Captain Mark Bathurst, Chairman
UAL-MEC Air Line Pilots Association
Section 3-M-1-e of the 2003 Pilot Agreement shall be revised to read in its entirety as follows:
Threshold Performance: 0.5% of Wages
Target Performance 1.0% of Wages
Maximum Performance 2.0% of Wages
Exhibit C
Profit Sharing
Effective Date of Profit Sharing Plan: | As of January 1, 2005 (so that the first year covered by the profit sharing plan shall be calendar year 2005). |
Profit Sharing Pool: | In the event that the Company has more than $10 million in Pre-Tax Earnings in the relevant calendar year, 7.5% of Pre-Tax Earnings in 2005 and 2006 and 15% of Pre-Tax Earnings in each calendar year thereafter. |
Pre-Tax Earnings: | UAL consolidated net income as determined in accordance with GAAP, but excluding (i) consolidated federal, state and local income tax expense (or credit); (ii) unusual, special, or non-recurring charges, (iii) charges with respect to the grant, exercise or vesting of equity, securities or options granted to UAL and United employees, and (iv) expense associated with the profit sharing contributions. |
Eligibility: | All domestic employees of UAL Corp. or United Airlines, Inc. (including all pilots) who have completed one year of service as of December 31st of the year for which Pre-Tax Earnings are being measured. |
Allocation: | For each eligible employee, a pro rata share of the Profit Sharing Pool for each calendar year based on the ratio of the employee's Considered Earnings for the year to the aggregate amount of Considered Earnings for all eligible employees that year. |
Considered Earnings: | As currently defined in the Company's Success Sharing Plan (i.e., base pay, overtime, holiday pay, longevity pay, sick pay, vacation pay, shift differential, premiums, pre-tax contributions to a 401(k) plan, pre-tax medical plan contributions, and flexible spending account contributions but not expense reimbursement, incentive or profit sharing payments, imputed income or other similar awards or allowances). |
Payment Date: | By no later than April 30th of the following year. |
Distribution: | In cash, subject to 401(k) deferrals. |
Relationship to Other Programs: | Incremental to the Success Sharing Plan; in lieu of the existing profit sharing plan described in Section 3-M-2 of the 2003 Pilot Agreement. |
Documentation: | Implementing documentation reasonably acceptable to the Association. |
Duration: | Continuing unless and until terminated in a future pilot collective bargaining agreement. |
Exhibit D
Convertible Notes
Issuer: | Reorganized UAL Corp. |
Guarantor: | United Airlines, Inc. |
Issue: | [___]% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes Due 2021 (the "Notes") to be issued no later than 180 days following the Exit Date (the "Issuance Date"). |
Initial Holder: | A trust or similar non-permanent vehicle for the benefit of eligible United pilots; the Notes or the value of the Notes to be distributed to such pilots or pilot retirement accounts as soon as reasonably practicable given tax, accounting, securities and market considerations; all rights of the Notes to be exercised by individual pilots while the notes remain in the trust. Distribution mechanics, eligibility and allocation among such pilots to be reasonably determined by the Association. |
Principal Amount: | $550,000,000 in denominations of $1,000. |
Term: | 15 years from the Issuance Date. |
Amortization: | None prior to maturity; full principal to be repaid at the maturity date except to the extent converted or prepaid. |
Interest Rate: | Semi-annually in arrears, in cash, at an annual rate of [__]%1; provided, however, that (i) the first full year of interest from the Issuance Date may be paid in cash or in kind at the option of the Issuer; (ii) if such interest is paid in kind, it will be in Common Stock, but only to the extent there exists Common Stock that is exempt from registration under 11 U.S.C. § 1145; and (iii) if such interest is paid in kind, it shall be delivered to the Holders under applicable market terms at issuance for public convertible debt securities of this type (e.g., any notice period and stock payment premium). |
Security: | None. |
Ranking: | Junior to the Reorganized UAL exit facility, customary secured indebtedness, indebtedness contemplated under a plan of reorganization, and other mutually agreed-upon indebtedness; pari passu to all current and future UAL or United Airlines senior unsecured debt; senior to all current and future subordinated debt. |
Conversion Rights: | The Holder may convert any number of the Notes into the Issuer's common stock (the "Common Stock"), at any time, at the Conversion Price. |
Conversion Price: | The product of (x) 125% and (y) the average closing price of the Common Stock for the sixty consecutive trading days following the Exit Date. |
Transferability: | To the greatest extent feasible under applicable law, the Notes and the Common Stock shall be issued under 11 U.S.C. §1145, and the Notes and the Common Stock into which they shall be convertible shall be freely transferable by the Holders without registration under the Securities Act of 1933. |
Common Stock: | When delivered, the Common Stock into which Notes may convert shall be fully paid and non-assessable. Issuer shall use its best efforts to list the Common Stock on a national stock exchange or NASDAQ prior to the Issuance Date. |
Call Rights: | No call for five years from the Issuance Date; thereafter, callable in cash or Common Stock if the Common Stock has traded at no less than 125% of the Conversion Price for the sixty (60) consecutive trading days prior to the call date. |
Put Rights: | Soft put right on the fifth and tenth anniversary of the Issuance Date for all principal and accrued interest as of such date; payable in cash or shares of Common Stock. |
Mandatory Prepayments: | Mandatory prepayment upon a "fundamental change" with a customary make whole premium, if any, for public convertible debt securities of this type; no prepayment obligations for mergers in which the Issuer is the surviving entity; no make whole premium in other mergers. |
Anti-Dilution Protections: | The Conversion Price will be subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, including upon (i) stock or extraordinary cash dividends, (ii) reclassifications, subdivisions or combinations of the Common Stock, (iii) the issuance of rights or warrants to all holders of Common Stock convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock at less than the then-current market price, (iv) distribution of the capital stock of an Issuer subsidiary to holders of the Common Stock and (v) any other distributions of assets by the Issuer to holders of the Common Stock. |
Mergers and Business Combinations: | The Notes will enjoy customary adjustments and protections in the event the Common Stock is converted into, reclassified into or exchanged for cash, other assets or securities. |
Other Terms and Conditions: | The Notes are intended to be public market securities and to trade at par value. The documentation of the Notes shall include such other terms and conditions as are customarily found in public market convertible securities of this type. |
Implementation: | Implementing documentation reasonably acceptable to the Association and the Company. |
Distribution: | The Association and the Company will coordinate any distribution of the Notes so that such distribution does not unreasonably interfere with capital markets activities of the UAL or the Company. The Association's investment bankers will be the exclusive distribution agent for the Notes. |
Exhibit E
Amended Distribution Agreement
1. Section 2 of Letter of Agreement 03-07 to the 2003 Pilot Agreement (the "Distribution Agreement") is hereby
2. Section 3 of the Distribution Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Exhibit F
Indemnity Agreement
1. Indemnification. UAL and the Company (collectively, "United") hereby indemnify and hold harmless the Association, its members, officers, committee members, agents, employees, counsel, financial advisors and representatives (each, an "Indemnified Person") from any and all losses, damages, fines, penalties, taxes, expenses, claims, lawsuits, or administrative charges of any sort whatsoever (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs arising in connection with the investigation and defense of any such matter) relating to, concerning or connected with the negotiation or implementation of this Letter of Agreement (any such event, a "Claim"), except to the extent that a Claim against an Indemnified Person is finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence, fraud or willful misconduct of such Indemnified Person.
2. Indemnification Procedure.
a. An Indemnified Person must give prompt notice to the
Company of the facts and circumstances that
may constitute a Claim under this Indemnity Agreement; provided, however,
that any delay by an Indemnified
Person in giving such notice shall not relieve United of its obligations
under this Indemnity Agreement except to the
extent that such delay causes material damage or prejudice to United.
b. United shall be entitled to participate in judicial,
administrative proceeding concerning an actual or
potential Claim (an "Action") and, upon ten (10) days notice to the applicable
Indemnified Person, may assume
the defense of such Claim with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified
Person. Following any
assumption of the defense of an Action by United, United shall not be liable
for any subsequent fees of legal
counsel or other expenses incurred by the Indemnified Person in connection
with the defense of such Action,
subject to reimbursement for actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
the Indemnified Person as the result of a
request for cooperation or assistance by United; provided, however, that
if, in the reasonable opinion of outside
counsel to the Indemnified Person, there exists an actual, material conflict
of interest between the United and the
Indemnified Person, United shall be liable for the legal fees and expenses
of separate counsel to the Indemnified
Person; provided, further, that the Indemnified Person shall have the right
to participate in the defense of an
Action with its own counsel at its own expense.
c. No compromise or settlement of any Action shall be
binding on United for purposes of United's
obligations under this Indemnity Agreement without United's express written
consent, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld. United shall not compromise or settle any Action
or otherwise admit to any liability for any
Claim on a basis that would reasonably be expected to adversely affect
the future activity or conduct of the
Indemnified Person without the prior written consent of the Indemnified
Person, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
d. In the event United assumes the defense of any Action
under this Indemnity Agreement, United shall (i)
keep the Association and the applicable Indemnified Person informed of
material developments in the Action, (ii)
promptly provide the Association and such Indemnified Person with copies
of all pleadings, responsive pleadings,
motions and other similar legal documents and papers received in connection
with the Action, (iii) permit the
Association and such Indemnified Person and their counsel, to the extent
practicable, to confer on the defense of
the Action, and (iv) permit the Association and such Indemnified Person
and their counsel, to the extent
practicable, an opportunity to review all legal papers to be submitted
prior to their submission. The parties shall
provide to each others such assistance as may be reasonably required to
insure the proper and adequate defense
of the Action, and each party shall use its good faith efforts and cooperate
with each other party to avoid the
waiver of any privilege of another party.
3.
Plan of Reorganization; Survival. This indemnity agreement shall
be assumed under the Plan of Reorganization and shall continue in full
force and effect thereafter without regard to the terms of Section 22 of
the Revised 2003 Pilot Agreement.
Exhibit G
Fees and Expenses
1. The Company shall reimburse the Associatin for the reasonable, actual fees and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Association in connection with the review, design, negotiation, approval and ratification of this Letter of Agreement (its "Expenses") including:
a. reasonable flight pay loss incurred by the Association
in review and negotiation of this Letter of
Agreement and Special MEC Meetings or LEC Meetings called for the purpose
of reviewing, approving or
ratifying the Letter of Agreement ; and
b. the reasonable, actual fees and expenses of the Association's
outside legal, pension, and other
professional advisors (in each case based on normal hourly rates for actual
time expended).
up to a maximum, aggregate total of $2.5 million. Of the total reimbursement for Expenses, $1 million shall be paid on the Effective Date, and the remaining $1.5 million will be paid on the Exit Date.
2. On the Exit Date, the Company shall also pay, or reimburse the Association for paying, the expenses incurred by the Association's investment bankers in connection with the Letter of Agreement and a structuring fee for the Association's investment bankers.
3. The Company shall seek judicial approval for its obligations under this Exhibit G at the same time that it seeks judicial approval of this Letter of Agreement.
4.The parties acknowledge and agree that the Company's agreement to reimburse the Association for fees and expenses under this Letter of Agreement is a result of the special collective bargaining circumstances created by the parties' desire to negotiate modifications to the pilot collective bargaining agreement as part of the Company's bankruptcy reorganization.
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings: | ||
Loss before income taxes |
$(2,500)
|
$(706)
|
Fixed charges, from below |
362
|
317
|
Undistributed losses of affiliates |
4
|
(2)
|
Interest capitalized |
(5)
|
1
|
Loss |
$ (2,139)
|
$(390)
|
Fixed charges: | ||
Interest expense |
$ 220
|
$ 237
|
Portion of rental expense representative | ||
of the interest factor |
142
|
80
|
Fixed charges |
$ 362
|
$ 317
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
(a)
|
(a)
|
___________
UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings: | ||
Loss before income taxes |
$(2,500)
|
$(706)
|
Fixed charges, from below |
367
|
322
|
Undistributed losses of affiliates |
4
|
(2)
|
Interest capitalized |
(5)
|
1
|
Loss |
$(2,134)
|
$(385)
|
Fixed charges: | ||
Interest expense |
$ 220
|
$ 237
|
Preferred stock dividend requirements |
5
|
5
|
Portion of rental expense representative | ||
of the interest factor |
142
|
80
|
Fixed charges |
$ 367
|
$ 322
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
(a)
|
(a)
|
__________
(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and preferred stock
dividend requirements by $2.5 billion in 2005 and $707 million in 2004.
I, Glenn F. Tilton, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of UAL Corporation (the "Company"), certify that:
(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4) The Company's other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control
over financial reporting; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.
I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of UAL Corporation (the "Company"), certify that:
(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4) The Company's other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control
over financial reporting; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.
I, Glenn F. Tilton, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of UAL Corporation (the "Company") certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of UAL Corporation (the "Company") certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.